data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84aa1/84aa16133593c3f7828523845df5731a07d9356a" alt=""
A 2013 vote at the Capitol Hill Community Council drew a huge crowd as the group made big decisions on how much growth above Capitol Hill Station to support (Image: CHS)
HELP KEEP CHS PAYWALL-FREE
Subscribe to CHS to help us hire writers and photographers to cover the neighborhood. CHS is a pay what you can community news site with no required sign-in or paywall. To stay that way, we need you.
Become a subscriber to help us cover the neighborhood for as little as $5 a month.
Does Capitol Hill still need a community council?
The neighborhood’s volunteer council was, as former president of the group (2013-2017) Zachary Pullin said, “a scrappy group of people that looked like and represented Capitol hill and fought for a more welcoming and inclusive neighborhood.”
Pullin said Capitol Hill’s council was special because it fought for neighborhood issues because the council wanted to be a part of change — not stop it. Change is inevitable and “the best thing we can do is to be there helping to shape that change,” Pullin said.
Elsewhere around Seattle and the region, that progressive nature isn’t necessarily the community group norm. In May, Crosscut reported on the power groups like Houghton Community Council, the East Bellevue Community Council, and volunteer entities like the Seattle Design Review Boards have in shaping issues around land use policy. Seattle has convened a stakeholder group to overhaul its design review process.
Seattle City Hall and Mayor Bruce Harrell are also considering how better to reignite the flame of community group power in Seattle after the death of the more formalized City Neighborhood Council system. Continue reading