Post navigation

Prev: (03/25/25) | Next: (03/25/25)

The Capitol Hill Department of Transportation? Rogue stop signs un-installed along busy E John

(Image: CHS)

The Seattle Department of Transportation’s $1.55 billion levy plan for 2025 includes Broadway safety improvements, an E Union “Revival,” and transit safety investments. But few of those projects will be more than planning this year.

The guerrilla Capitol Hill Department of Transportation?

It works faster — though its projects don’t tend to last.

Over the weekend, someone completed the latest rogue addition to the neighborhood’s streetscape, secretly installing stop signs on the busy intersections along E John above 12th Ave where pedestrians hoping to cross are often left waiting — or sprinting — to get to the other side.

“Anyone know anything about the new stop signs that went up on E John St (East & West) at 13th & 14th? I just watched some VERY CONFUSED drivers create some very unsafe pedestrian and driving conditions because of them,” a neighbor posting in the CHS Facebook Group wrote about the installation. “Usually when the city puts up something like this there’s “traffic control change” signs, stop lines painted in the street, and are more visible than these new stop signs that seem very ‘rogue.'”

CHS’s calls to the city about the project turned out to be a bit of a FIND IT FIX IT moment. An SDOT spokesperson passed our information along the department’s crew assigned to remove the signs. As suspected, they were very, very rogue.

“We were notified this morning about unauthorized stop signs installed at E. John St. and 14th Ave,” the SDOT spokesperson told CHS Monday afternoon. “Our crews promptly removed the signs in the eastbound and westbound directions later in the morning.”

The signs at 13th Ave were news to SDOT but they were planning to send a crew back out.

“Safety is our top priority, and we are taking steps to ensure traffic control devices are properly installed and maintained,” the spokesperson said.

Though the signs were city-grade, the installation was not and the flimsy stakes made it easy for other self-assigned neighborhood street planners to knock a couple of the signs down.

(Images: CHS)

The E John incident follows the 2022 installation of a mostly well executed rogue crosswalk at Harvard and E Olive Way at another busy intersection where crossing on foot or bike can be nearly impossible. The city also quickly wiped away those markings while reminding citizens that a planned project would eventually make the crossing safer. Last September, a pedestrian was hit by a driver at the intersection where the planned “Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons” crossing system still had not been installed.

The basic stop sign has been a go-to safety feature in SDOT’s toolset as it tries to reshape Capitol Hill traffic patterns to make the area safer for walkers, riders, and drivers. E Pine intersections got the treatment last year to join a similar re-engineering of E Pike’s core to better control traffic and improve safety from I-5 to 15th Ave, upgrading intersections on the only remaining Pike/Pine blocks not already controlled by a traffic signal or a 4-way stop.

CHS is not aware of any such project lined up for John above 12th but we’re checking.

In the meantime, the Capitol Hill Department of Transportation is likely planning its next projects.

 

$5 A MONTH TO HELP KEEP CHS PAYWALL-FREE THIS SPRING
🌈🐣🌼🌷🌱🌳🌾🍀🍃🦔🐇🐝🐑🌞🌻 

Subscribe to CHS to help us hire writers and photographers to cover the neighborhood. CHS is a pay what you can community news site with no required sign-in or paywall. To stay that way, we need you.

Become a subscriber to help us cover the neighborhood for $5 a month -- or choose your level of support 👍 

 
Subscribe and support CHS Contributors -- $1/$5/$10 per month

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

7 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mi mi Yung
Mi mi Yung
22 days ago

somebody has to blow the mayor for a real one,,

Nation of Inflation Gyration
Nation of Inflation Gyration
22 days ago

I want my crosswalk at Harvard back too.

Nandor
Nandor
21 days ago

There is a crosswalk at Harvard… lines do not a crosswalk make. What we need is a few weeks of issuing a ton of tickets to drivers who fail to yield until it gets pounded into the heads of drivers that they need to stop… that all intersections are crosswalks, unless crossing is expressly forbidden, lines or not.

Hillery
Hillery
22 days ago

How about it some rogue pothole pavers or rogue sidewalk fixes lol

Over it
Over it
21 days ago
Reply to  Hillery

We are on our own up here. No services provided for years unless you are a meth addict from Florida living in a tent. Then the city will roll out the red carpet with an unlimited tap to taxpayer dollars

Rob
Rob
21 days ago

I walk this route every day and so do tons of people. There is a flashing-light cross walk on 10th and traffic lights + cross-walk signs on 12th and 15th. I agree it can be annoying having to go ‘an extra block’ to a marked crossing. I think the problem is both with impatient pedestrians and aggressive drivers. I don’t think a stop sign is the right thing here, but putting an additional cross-walk with flashing lights on 14th, as the hill crests and visibility is poor, could help.

Tiffany
Tiffany
21 days ago
Reply to  Rob

It’s just a terrible design. There should be speed bumps installed at the very least. Cars are coming up the hill accelerating rapidly to try and beat the left turn at 15th. It’s not uncommon for me to see cars going 40+ as they crest the hill. Not only is that extremely high speed for the visibility it also coincides with pedestrians natural instinct to not cross at 15th and then walk back 200 feet to the (now) single entrance of safeway. When the door on 15th was open this was not as much of an issue.

And yea, the amount of potholes and sidewalk repairs needed is a concern as well. The city is just so poorly run at times. I noticed the junk from the contruction crew on 14th and Denny over flowing onto the sidewalk this weekend. How is that not a fine? How is that acceptable in a city that ostensibly is all about environmental impacts?