Post navigation

Prev: (11/14/24) | Next: (11/14/24)

Does Seattle Public Schools really need to close Stevens Elementary?

(Image: Google Earth)

Seattle Public Schools says this week is about providing information and answering questions as it holds a series of community meetings including a districtwide online session Thursday and a local meeting Friday night at Stevens Elementary to discuss the planned cost cutting-driven closure of four campuses including the North Capitol Hill school.

“Please note this is not a public hearing,” SPS says about Thursday’s online session. “Those meetings will be held in December.”

The same goes for Friday night’s session at Stevens. The district has already wrapped up meetings at other schools on the cut list including a session Tuesday night at West Seattle’s Sanislo Elementary where parents reportedly heard from district officials about the planned closures and asked sometimes loaded questions of the district officials who attended.

CHS reported here last month as Stevens emerged as one of four Seattle elementary campuses on a list of planned “consolidations” as the district backed down from an initial plan that could have cut 21 schools from the system after public outcry.

Stevens-area kids would be split to E Mercer’s Lowell Elementary — or Montlake where Seattle Public Schools is making its capital investments in the area. With long-term projections showing continued demand in Central Seattle, SPS is overhauling and expanding the Montlake Elementary campus as a centerpiece in the system.

Cuts in state funding and a forecast for a continued near-term drop in enrollment has the district scrambling to cover what has been expected to be a $131 million budget deficit for the current school year with continued financial shortfalls expected over coming years. But there is growing pushback on the closure plans as the district’s forecasts have been thrown into doubt. In his latest update on the cutback proposal, Superintendent Brent Jones said the district’s current projections would represent a $94 million deficit — down significantly from previous forecasts.

The district says the decision to close Stevens and the three other elementary campuses is based on criteria including building condition, the “facility’s design in support of all types of learning,” and enrollment and capacity with a threshold requiring a campus to be able to support at least 400 students with space for services and preschool classrooms.

Stevens is old. A shutdown would end more than 100 years of public education on the campus and the landmarked property where a Stevens school has welcomed children since 1906. The campus buildings have been overhauled and seismically improved in recent decades.

Stevens is limited. The campus reached a peak enrollment of just over 400 in 2013 when the district adjusted area attendance boundaries to address concerns about overcrowding at the school. Its blacktop schoolyard is surrounded by single-family style homes in one of the wealthiest areas of the city.

(Image: Google Earth)

But Stevens is loved. CHS reported on an open letter signed by nearly 200 people with testimonials about why the school should not be closed. The letter also provided responses to how Stevens meets or exceeds the district’s needs under the criteria it says it is using to determine the cuts. “Stevens is the most active and accessible school in the district. SDOT assessed in June 2024 that 70% of our students traveled to school safely by foot, bike and transit every day,” the letter reads.

The district has said it plans to hold two meetings at each of the schools targeted for closure before December’s public hearings required by state law.

The board could vote on a final plan in January.

Some families are not waiting. A parent group says it has filed a complaint in King County Superior Court for permission to collect signatures to mount a recall against school board president Liz Rankin.

The Recall Liza Rankin group writes:

We seek Director Rankin’s recall because we care deeply about the education of Seattle’s children, so they can reach their full human potential and become well educated citizens, and because we believe fervently in the critical importance of public schools.

We allege several distinct ways in which Director Rankin demonstrated malfeasance, misfeasance, and violation of her oath of office. Director Rankin has not met her responsibilities to the citizens of the School District, or, most critically, to the children who she is charged with educating.

We seek the recall of Director Rankin for:

  1. Adopting a rushed and improper process for closing schools,

  2. Repeatedly failing to provide transparency and community engagement on decisions critical to the well-being of the District,

  3. Failing to perform the basic oversight of the District expected of any Board Director,

  4. Failing to uphold the responsibilities of the School Board to ensure the District delivers student educational outcomes.

  5. Closing the Interagency Academy without following proper procedure

“Each of these repeated failures not only rise to the level of misfeasance, malfeasance, and/or violation of oath of office, they endanger the future of Seattle Public Schools, they hinder and undermine the education of Seattle’s children, and they do damage to the public’s trust in a foundational civic institution,” the group writes.

Voters could be right behind those families. Polling by the Northwest Progressive Institute shows that 41% would support a recall while 33% aren’t yet sure. 55% said they are unsatisfied with “the direction of Seattle Public Schools” and 54% oppose the plan to close campuses.

Thursday’s online meeting information is below:

This districtwide, online meeting will take place on Thursday, Nov. 14, at 6:30 p.m.

Please note this is not a public hearing. Those meetings will be held in December.

Click to Join the Zoom Meeting
Join by phone: (253) 215-8782
Meeting ID: 879 8488 7463

Our online capacity is 1,000 attendees, but families will be able to watch via these methods:

Friday’s meeting at the Stevens campus is scheduled to begin at 6 PM. You can learn more here.

 

HELP KEEP CHS PAYWALL-FREE THIS SPRING
🌈🐣🌼🌷🌱🌳🌾🍀🍃🦔🐇🐝🐑🌞🌻 

Subscribe to CHS to help us hire writers and photographers to cover the neighborhood. CHS is a pay what you can community news site with no required sign-in or paywall. To stay that way, we need you.

Become a subscriber to help us cover the neighborhood for $5 a month -- or choose your level of support 👍 

 
Subscribe and support CHS Contributors -- $1/$5/$10 per month

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

26 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Local
Local
4 months ago

I think anyone who has a child go through SPS knows that the real problems sadly start at middle and high school.

harvardave
harvardave
4 months ago
Reply to  Local

Oh, you mean right around when the real problems started in your home

Stumpy
Stumpy
4 months ago
Reply to  harvardave

Kind of mean. Do you have to be mean?

A.J.
A.J.
4 months ago
Reply to  Local

That’s no an SPS issue, that is everywhere issue. You know what helps prevent that? Good primary schools with strong community ties.

Being able to walk or bike to school is better for children than sitting in traffic. It doesn’t just improve health and congestion, it improves behavior and academic performance, which can lead to better results in middle and high school. If you are actually concerned about secondary schools you should oppose this closure too.

Crow
Crow
4 months ago
Reply to  Local

Mcgilrva k-5 was excellent, Meany was not (we home-schooled for a year), now Garfield is excellent, my student has 3 AP courses this term.

chHill
chHill
4 months ago

I’m sure the parents advocating for Stevens and all other campuses slated for closure would also welcome a massive influx of cash to the state education fund. That is why we need to increase taxes on the wealthiest businesses and citizens in Washington, and additionally add a state income tax (like the vast majority of states already have). If my taxes fund the public infrastructure and society that private schools get to exist within, then the attendee’s parents need to be compelled to contribute adequately back to the public sphere, by accepting their fiscal responsibilities like real adults.

I’m sick of elected officials pretending we don’t have the capability to properly fund a damn public school budget when we hardly collect ANY taxes on the wealthy as it stands currently — especially now in the face of Trump announcing the planned closure of the Department of Education.

The answer is simple. Raise taxes on the wealthy. Yesterday!!!

butch griggs
butch griggs
4 months ago
Reply to  chHill

McCleary says 6 billion in arrears for education. The state constitutions #1 priority.

I never spent a full two years in the same school. Closures in the 8th grade and divorced parents who didn’t parent much. It destroyed me.

Stumpy
Stumpy
3 months ago
Reply to  butch griggs

I’m sorry. We moved a lot and it was very tough but not like every two years. That sounds so difficult. My parents did not divorce but maybe should have…

Are you agreeing that the schools should not be closed and we should tax the wealthy? I might agree with that but I want to know more about why specifically these schools were put on the list and who “the wealthy” will be.

Zippythepinhead
Zippythepinhead
4 months ago
Reply to  chHill

Thank you and your strident opinion and for ushering in the new regime. All hail the righteous progressive socialist.
Do you have children?

butch griggs
butch griggs
3 months ago

Really dude?

You people are amazing. The least educated of the American voter electret. Of course any money for education is poorly spent. Too much fat. Cut everything.

And you are the smart one right? Can we get a librarian in every school or is that too much for the 3 people who own 1/2 America’s wealth and growing?

Zippythepinhead
Zippythepinhead
3 months ago
Reply to  butch griggs

You people? At least I contributed money and spent time filling out voting postcards for the last election. Also, I have voted for every tax increase for education in this city and I don’t have any kids.
And I don’t scream that “the others” aren’t being taxed. I am the other, mf, and I’m paying my taxes, and helping feed the homeless, and volunteering, and I’m voting to pay more tax, on me.
Regarding education, I’ll match my degrees with you any day, you mouth breather 😛.
Dude. Stay on your meds. Or we could go have a beer.

butch griggs
butch griggs
3 months ago

Oh I screwed up…That was for the other guy…sorry man.

I am just old…Nothin’ else wrong here…lol

Stumpy
Stumpy
4 months ago
Reply to  chHill

I don’t disagree but I wonder what you consider to be “the wealthy. ” This will be a point of discussion going forward.

butch griggs
butch griggs
3 months ago
Reply to  Stumpy

Who do you consider wealthy?

Stumpy
Stumpy
3 months ago
Reply to  butch griggs

Well you’re the one going off about it so you go first. I’m honestly not sure myself. Do you have an idea? Income over 500K? Over a million? Over 250K? Who are “the wealthy ” in your opinion? Taxing extremely wealthy and reducing income huge disparities are certainly worth discussing but shouting “Tax the wealthy ” devoid of any of the slightest hints of details is reminiscent of SDS in the 60s which not a great way to go.

bestonion1
bestonion1
4 months ago

The “Stevens is old” paragraph doesn’t really do justice to the fact that 25 years ago the original Stevens building was fully renovated, and reopened in 2001 with the following totally new additions: a 3-story classroom wing, child-care building, and cafeteria/gym building. It cost $13.5 million back then, which probably is equal to a 2024 investment of at least $25 million if adjusted for Seattle construction inflation.

Neighbor
Neighbor
4 months ago
Reply to  bestonion1

I was thinking the same thing! It’s one of SPSs best maintained schools. New roof, solar panels and room for almost 400 kids. Even in SPS’s own documents it has the highest building score in the meany catch zone other than Montlake which will be brand new.

Stevens alum parent
Stevens alum parent
4 months ago

It seems likely that removing a neighborhood public school option in a neighborhood that already has one of the highest rates of private school attendance in the City would result in even more neighborhood families choosing to never try public schools, which will further erode support for public schools in Seattle among a group that has the ability to contribute significant amounts of time and money to the schools. And if you don’t participate in public schools, you may be less likely to support them generally. If you think strong public schools are a backbone to a healthy democracy, is this an action that contributes to strong public schools?

SPS Strategic Plan
SPS Strategic Plan
4 months ago

SPS is guided by Targeted Universalism, the children you are referring to are a distraction to the mission. Rankin has clearly stated this as has the rest of board. So have the voters.

If you don’t like this message? I would tell you to vote for other candidates for the school board come time for the next election, but it will take more then you and your best friend to change the outcome to the election.

The myth that you have been sold is that every child that goes to private school is somehow taking money from the public schools, this is untrue. The money will never outweigh the cost in focus that comes with it.

Stop the opportunity hoarding.

https://www.seattleschools.org/about/strategic-plan/

butch griggs
butch griggs
3 months ago

Naw…Ya see? It’s like this.

The wealthy and religious types have one school. Everyone else goes to another. If we have private schools? The public funding is not needed. So close the dept. of education.

Your Preger U type video simply touts the MAGA agenda.
Lifting people up, creates divisions. Eliminating severe poverty? Waste of money.

Funny how “Money is speech”. Yet you want people to simply starve to death. Too bad so sad if you can’t make it on your own. Right?

Nevermind someone like you is kicking the ladder out from under them before they ever start life. Before they breathe the free air of Earth, they are “othered”. Kids are drowning in debt before they leave school! Why? Private schools/Higher education.

What happens is this. The “haves” rule. The rest serve them. Forever. Flat wages for 50 years while the rich get richer.

SPS Strategic Plan
SPS Strategic Plan
3 months ago
Reply to  butch griggs

The video comes from the Seattle Public School’s website, you should check your bias.

SPS is focusing on the children that are most in need.

Rudey
Rudey
3 months ago

Gonna go out on a limb here and guess you do (or did) send kids to private school.

butch griggs
butch griggs
3 months ago
Reply to  Rudey

Yeah…lol

he avoids the point

Stumpy
Stumpy
4 months ago

A thoughtful reply. Thank you.

farts
farts
4 months ago

no one who can afford private school in that neighborhood sends their kids to steven’s anymore. that is been the case for a few years now. a casualty form the ideological changes and focus of SPS