Post navigation

Prev: (05/22/24) | Next: (05/23/24)

City says listening to safer streets advocates as it faces crashes and near misses in overhauled Pike/Pine connection between downtown and Capitol Hill

The results of a recent crash at Melrose and Pike from @streetcrafting

(Image: Office of the Watefront)

The city’s Pike Pine Streetscape and Bicycle Improvements project is meant to boost bicycling and pedestrian activity and create connectivity between downtown and Capitol Hill as the routes along the arteries are transitioned to one-way traffic in a $17.45 million effort.

But the design compromises and half-baked safety measures around partially completed changes are making the area dangerous for walkers, bikers, and drivers alike, community groups say, and raising some core questions around how Seattle City Hall handles transition into daily use for its new major projects and how it treats pedestrians and bicyclists in that process.

“For the short term issues, an ongoing problem since construction began over a year ago has been the lack of intuitive, comfortable detours for people biking, especially people going east up the hill on Pike,” David Seater of Central Seattle Greenways tells CHS. “At the start of construction, SDOT was recommending that people detour all the way to Belltown to avoid a few blocks of construction along Pike.”

Central Seattle Greenways, a community group focused on improving city streets for all users, told CHS that city leaders have largely been dodging their requests to address safety concerns that are a result of ongoing construction at Pike and Pine streets from 2nd Ave to Bellevue Ave with a core of challenges around the transitions near Melrose.

One issue is leadership. While the Seattle Department of Transportation typically handles the city’s street projects, this overhaul falls mostly under the city’s Office of the Waterfront. Just getting answers on the project and measures being taken to address concerns required back and forth with the departments to sort out who was in charge of what.

City officials on the project tell CHS the temporary disruptions that those who regularly travel through these streets experience will lead to net benefits following the completion of the project.

“Throughout construction, we have been making ongoing efforts to make it clearer for people biking and driving how to navigate the changes with the current conditions on Pike and Pine streets,” a statement sent to CHS reads. “We understand people have been confused and are committed to working to address the situation.”

The officials said part of the “ongoing challenges” to safety around the project is “repeated theft and vandalism of temporary traffic control and wayfinding signs.”

“We will continue to replace and reset signs and communicate changes as needed until the permanent improvements are in place and functioning for their intended purpose,” a representative said.

Seater says worries go beyond short-term concerns over missing signage.

CHS reported here on the construction challenges for the area from the project underway between I-5 and Bellevue Ave wrapping up 18 months of scheduled work changing the streets to one-way vehicular traffic and installing new bike lane protections.

Those challenges have now transitioned into day to day use challenges as the new traffic flow has opened and bicyclists are funneled into the designs despite missing signs and construction equipment blocking lanes.

Riders and drivers are finding many of the new design elements and signage confusing. Some needed safety elements are not fully in place. But others might need to be addressed with advocates calling for changes to SDOT’s plans needed to make riding in the area safer.

The intersection of Melrose at Pike in front of the busy Starbucks Roastery is of special concern. The block of Pike from 8th Ave to 9th Ave, under the convention center, is another.

Pike was converted to a one-way eastbound path from Terry and Hubbell to Bellevue, while Pine was converted into a one-way westbound from Melrose to 8th Ave where people can turn left onto Pine to utilize the recently made downhill bike lanes.

“The new bike lane has been built in the west half of this block, but work on the east half was delayed due to coordination problems with WSDOT. The construction involves changes to the entrance/exit from the I-5 express lanes and a gate that needs to be moved,” Seater says.

Three weeks ago, Seater met on-site with staff from the Office of the Waterfront, which is overseeing this project in tandem with SDOT’s lead on construction. During this meeting, CSG was told the office hoped to gain approval for finishing some of the installations and changes and after approval, would finish the work on that block within six weeks, according to Seater.

“The problem is that in the interim, there was no signed detour for people biking on Pike, who would be trapped on the left side of the street without a protected lane, and with vehicle traffic on their right trying to turn left across them to enter the freeway. Staff told us that they’d put up a detour directing people on bikes onto the narrow sidewalk, but after two weeks, there was still no detour,” Seater said.

SDOT and the office said cyclists can travel eastbound on Pike between 1st Ave and Melrose Ave through the constructed, protected bike lane.

East of 9th up to Melrose and Bellevue also have a lack of signage. When construction in this area is completed, the protected bike lane on the north side of the street will be for people biking east up Pike, which differs from the past design when that lane was used by people biking west down Pike, Seater noted.

“… the biking crossing and bike box at Pike & Melrose continue to be abused. How do you plan to ensure this isn’t a regular problem?” — @streetcrafting

“The problem is that SDOT had put up no signage at Melrose to tell people biking west that they needed to take a new route (north on Melrose or Minor to Pine). As a result, there were people biking in both directions along those blocks of Pike in a land that is too narrow to do that safely,” Seater said. “Much like the situation at 8th, the detour signage that the Office of the Waterfront told us they would put up were not installed for two weeks until we wrote our letter.”

The design of Melrose and Pike is turning out to be a dangerous one: drivers block the crosswalk and bike lane, they turn the wrong way onto Pike, and ignore Do Not Enter signs. SDOT and the Office of the Waterfront and Civic Projects said on May 17th, they painted the final directional markings at the intersection of Melrose Ave and Pike, within the bike lanes.

“These markings were the final step needed before creating the final operation transitioning westbound bike travel from Pike St to Pine St via northbound travel on Melrose Ave. We also placed a temporary barrier with temporary wayfinding to help people biking adapt to and navigate this area,” an announcement on the work read.

Up next, the temporary barriers will be replaced with a concrete island, which the office and department said would make it clearer to drivers that they can no longer travel northbound on Melrose and should not enter Melrose from Pine. SDOT believes the concrete island will create a permanent barrier and guide for cyclists traveling westbound, and will signal they should turn right to continue using the “bike facilities.”

But CSG isn’t convinced.

“We believe that a big part of the problem is that SDOT installed what’s called a “half signal” at this intersection, where there is a standard traffic signal for drivers along Pike, but only stop signs for drivers on Melrose/Minor,” Seater said. “This means that drivers turning onto or crossing Pike do not have a traffic signal to give them a dedicated time to cross, and with poor visibility down Pike. They will creep forward into the intersection, endangering people walking and biking and risking collisions with eastbound drivers.”

SDOT and the Office of the Waterfront & Civic Projects said traffic signals will be moved to the east side of the street to improve visibility and clarity for all in decisions reached after met with the representatives from Seattle Neighborhood Greenways last month.

The city says staff are planning to visit this intersection this week “to observe how the changes are working and determine if more adjustments are needed beyond what has already been planned.”

On social media, a user known as @streetcrafting dropped an image of a near collision on May 16, where a SUV rolled into a bike lane, almost taking out an electric scooter rider. Streetcrafting and other users continue to document their travel experiences and sightings on these streets online.

Seater said during the design phase of this construction project, CSG warned city staff that these dangers would occur, but the feedback was largely ignored.

“Those concerns are now becoming reality,” Seater said.

 

HELP KEEP CHS PAYWALL-FREE
Subscribe to CHS to help us hire writers and photographers to cover the neighborhood. CHS is a pay what you can community news site with no required sign-in or paywall. To stay that way, we need you.

Become a subscriber to help us cover the neighborhood for as little as $5 a month

 
Subscribe and support CHS Contributors -- $1/$5/$10 per month

25 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Hillery
Hillery
8 months ago

On top of safety issues the whole area is just miserable. It can take several light cycles for buses and cars to get thru the area (past or up Bellevue) from both Pine and Pike causing quite elongated backups. Those who don’t car me about cars well the buses are definitely impacted. There are no turn lanes on Bellevue and Pine and now with the no turn on red my bus took forever to get thru the area.

CD Resident
CD Resident
8 months ago
Reply to  Hillery

Only way is to get more people out of cars. That’s the only thing you can do it an area that dense.

Jesse
Jesse
8 months ago
Reply to  Hillery

More bus only roads

DD15
DD15
8 months ago

The construction situation has been terribly managed. The long term (post-construction) solution isn’t going to be much better. This is a half-assed project where at every point in the design process, community feedback said exactly that and predicted the outcomes we’re now seeing. SDOT, Office of the Waterfront, whoever it was, never listened to what anyone who actually used these streets told them. So, we’ll get stuck with whatever this is for a decade or more.

Frank
Frank
8 months ago

It is intentionally made difficult for cars. SDOT is a political action organization, modeling itself after Dutch efforts to eliminate cars from the streets of the last two decades.Seattle’s electrical grid is about 90% renewable (+/- a few percentage points depending on the day), and our vehicles are about 18% electric (as reported by registrations), and rising all the time. This whole method is reactionary and short-sighted, since cars aren’t going to be the big, bad meanie they’ve always been in a few years. We should be SEPARATING cars and unprotected humans right now with our street planning, so that people have a great chance of avoiding getting hit, so that when this is the only argument against cars, we have already solved the problem, because it isn’t that far off. We should also stop aiming for 0 pedestrian deaths, because nobody has ever achieved it, or even come close. It’s a dumb political talking point that is motivating people to make reeeeallly bad decisions with our streets. Once again, we are seeing hyper-reactive progressive initiatives with unintended consequences and ironically counterproductive results.

Charles Burlingame
Charles Burlingame
8 months ago
Reply to  Frank

“We should be SEPARATING cars and unprotected humans”

So you agree this project is badly needed, it’s just not quite there yet?

Twisted Panties
Twisted Panties
8 months ago
Reply to  Frank

If you even read the article, you can see the whole point was these outcomes are what happen when you let an organization like SDOT water down every single idea into a cheaper, worse version. If they followed through, and didn’t short change things there wouldn’t be this mess. You also COMPLETELY ignore the mineral requirements and carbon heavy extraction/manufacturing processes in those astonishingly heavy, road damaging electric cars that will magically solve all these problems. This is a half baked pie of nonsense you’ve made here, good work. Bizarre twisting of almost every label you could think of that you don’t like. Hyper reactive progressive initiatives? These are virtue signaling, tax sinkholes made from neoliberal policies with no oversight. I doubt you’ll even read this far though, goofball.

Sam
Sam
8 months ago

oof, someone got triggered

Jesse
Jesse
8 months ago
Reply to  Sam

They’re right tho

Frank
Frank
8 months ago

Truth is, I can’t read. You can tell because I have a different opinion than you.

Yesler's Ghost
Yesler's Ghost
8 months ago
Reply to  Frank

Here’s an interactive map of every place around the world that has been able to go an entire year without any pedestrian deaths since 2009. https://www.dekra-vision-zero.com/map

It’s possible if you don’t treat the initiative like it’s impossible already.

if you think electric cars will suddenly mean cars don’t contribute negatively to our emissions, you should research the minerals that go into their massive batteries, and how much fossil fuels are used to make them in the first place. Cars are bad because they are extremely space inefficient when most people are using them for single private trips, AND (still almost 80% of them) actively kill the environment for their fuel.

The long and short of it is that cars cannot keep being most peoples primary form of transit, and we have to make people stop driving for trips that don’t require a car. Having high goals for pedestrian safety isn’t what’s driving these half-measures, it’s that we aren’t actually allocating the right resources to the right departments to get this done. It’s people like you who assume electric cars will fix everything so we don’t actually need to change habits that are causing this corridor to be unsafe for everyone. Kicking the can down the road because “cars won’t be the big, bad meanie they’ve always been” so anything done to disincentives car use is, according to you, “hyper-reactive progressive initiatives”.

We need to be dedicating less road space to cars, we need to disincentives car use as much as we possibly can, and people have to change their habits. I’m sorry that change is so scary to you that you can’t imagine a better world, but don’t hold everyone else back because of your stupidity, thanks!

Daemien
Daemien
8 months ago
Reply to  Yesler's Ghost

You mean: we need to redo our entire society?

So, get started on that. I’ll wait.

Frank
Frank
8 months ago
Reply to  Yesler's Ghost

Ohhhhhhh, they mean zero pedestrian deaths … in one year? If you leave out the time part of the statement, as has been done, it means something different. My bad, though, this entire time I’ve ready “Vision Zero” as “No pedestrian deaths ever”. You simply won’t ever get people completely out of cars. Ever. It won’t work politically, even in this ridiculous city. Work within that framework or create a mish-mash of watered down policies that affect nothing positively.

urbanisthick
urbanisthick
8 months ago
Reply to  Frank

wow that is crazy no one ever achieved 0 pedestrian deaths? you are lying xoxo https://apnews.com/article/hoboken-zero-traffic-deaths-daylighting-pedestrian-safety-007dec67706c1c09129da1436a3d9762

Cameron
Cameron
8 months ago

This is the route I take when biking to work and it’s been soooo confusing. especially hate the part biking up Pike from downtown where I have to switch sides of the street which feels really unsafe. Thanks for the reporting.

butch griggs
butch griggs
8 months ago
Reply to  Cameron

Yeah…The whole thing is all chopped up. Unless you know all the potholes, manhole covers. Having to merge with traffic when switching to bike lanes on the other side of the street…I just kinda do my best when there’s a break in the traffic.

BBTM
BBTM
8 months ago

The problem is that the majority of the employees at SDOT don’t care. For them it’s just a job and they don’t feel pride for the city. They just handle each job without thinking about how it fits within the long term vision for a safer, more livable city or how it impacts not only the street users (pedestrians, bikes and cars) but also the local businesses. Pike/Pine is not the only example of that shortsightedness. Just look at Madison!
Turning Pike and Pine into one-way streets should have triggered a full traffic evaluation of all surrounding streets and answer questions like should Bellevue be one-way northbound from Pike maybe all the way to Olive.

Optimist
Optimist
8 months ago

Another feature of the new design that I think may be bound to fail is having one-way bike traffic on Pike and Pine. It sort of boggles my mind that with all the extra street width gained from making car traffic one-way, they couldn’t find a way to make two-way bike traffic work (it doesn’t take much width—look at 4th Ave). This has already led to bikers using the one lane in both directions, which is just asking for trouble since downhill bikes pick up a lot of speed. I get it though: for the majority (?) of bikers that are coming to Cap Hill from north of downtown, it doesn’t make any sense to go out of the way to the crazy bike lane situation on Pike, when going against the flow of traffic up Pine feels more natural and safe.

Meg
Meg
8 months ago
Reply to  Optimist

Yeah, it’s ridiculous. People on bikes & scooters are simply going the “wrong” way regardless anyway, and I can’t say I blame them–because on one hand, it’s stupid (if I’m trying to get to the south convention center & live in Capitol Hill on Pike, why on earth would I want to extend my trip by like 5 minutes by looping up and over to go down Pine, having to cross even more traffic in the process too?), and on the other hand, the signage is SO confusing. There’s even a bike signal on the west side of the street for the bike lane that’s supposedly just supposed to be for heading east; how is anyone supposed to understand that?
Absolutely idiotic choices overall. I’m sure at the time they thought they were doing what was best, but that just tells me the people making those calls never have had to use any of the actual infrastructure they’re attempting to change.

Nandor
Nandor
8 months ago

It’s clear that the “designers” of projects like these have never in their lives ridden a bike… Stupidest thing I’ve ever seen… Putting up a twister board in the middle of an intersection doesn’t make anyone safer, it just makes everyone confused. Any cyclist with experience knows that downhill bike lanes are in general stupidly dangerous and “protected” ones even more. Anywhere you are easily going the speed of traffic the best and safest place to be is taking the lane, where you can see, you can be seen, you have options if someone pulls abruptly out of a side street or opens a car door, drivers are not tempted to pass and then turn in front of you and you aren’t in danger of being suddenly dumped into a complete mess like this intersection…
In general Seattle’s so called bike infrastructure is bad… this is horrendous.

zach
zach
8 months ago

Yet another example proving that SDOT is, by far, the most dysfunctional City department!

SeattleGeek
SeattleGeek
8 months ago
Reply to  zach

Not compared to SPD.

fjnd
fjnd
8 months ago

Having bike commuted on this exact route for some 20 years before the recent madness – I can say it felt safer and indeed quicker when it was just me on my bike among the cars and busses, on through streets. And I am a slow bicyclist. When it got scary going uphill in traffic, I could easily go onto the sidewalk for a few blocks. Direct, predictable routes are safer than weaving back and forth. Those stop signs at every block make sense for the increased pedestrians, but good grief, having to stop my bike going downhill on Pine at every block now? And I can’t safely roll through the stop signs when there are cars there, too. Who at SDOT rides a bike? Does anyone try these things out first?

Nandor
Nandor
8 months ago
Reply to  fjnd

FYI – Washington state law protects you from idiocy like this… You are NOT required to use bike lanes. It’s left up to the individual to make their own decision about where they are safest.

GGG
GGG
8 months ago

I know someone from WSDOT that is on this project, and that person is a bike commuter and a bikie who cares. It is fair to say that dysfunctional organizations are dysfunctional because they cannot even deliver what they WANT to deliver. What we have here is a camel, an ugly horse designed by committee and the constraints of budget. The sad thing is, things that are deemed important get their own built-in funding source, like the B&O tax pays for upgrades to the convention center every 20 years or so. They didn’t have to go ask the voters to pass a bond to make this “upgrade” that most people in Seattle will never use. Let’s face it, the Convention Center is for out-of-towners.