Post navigation

Prev: (02/28/24) | Next: (02/29/24)

A sixth story and a prized European hornbeam tree — Neighbors have their say on extra height for 15th Ave QFC redevelopment project

There are more powerful actions they can take but neighbors opposing a proposed sixth floor on the mixed-use development being planned for the old QFC block of Capitol Hill’s 15th Ave E got their say Wednesday night. Several neighbors supporting the plan and increased housing options on the busy commercial street on the edge of Capitol HIll’s single family-style house core also spoke up.

Around thirty residents voiced their opinions on the proposed mixed-use development as planners from the Seattle Department of Construction and Inspection took notes and coordinated the brisk Wednesday evening meeting.

While many criticized the idea of a six-story building rising above 15th Ave E, there were also plenty of attendees during the virtual meeting who expressed support for increasing housing density amid the city’s ongoing housing and affordability crisis.

“I live less than a mile from this proposed project. I think this is a great project. It should be approved as proposed,” said one. “This project is located in, and will add to an already existing business area.”

Capitol Hill developer Hunters Capital — whose mixed-use development up the street replacing the old Hilltop Service Station will wrap up construction later this year — is requesting a departure from area zoning for its QFC project to allow an extra sixth story of height.

Hunters and Runberg Architecture Group say their preferred “S” design would meet requirements for preserving the E Republican canopy, provide space for a larger 15th Ave E plaza to break up the retail facade and provide additional corner retail space, allow for a north podium deck, make room for a “pedestrian through block” breezeway on the south end of the project next to the old firehouse building, keep the back alley from becoming too tightly crowded, and allow for residential use of the alley.

The “S” design would create 170 new apartment units in a six-story building, with about 10,000 square feet of retail space, and underground parking for 99 vehicles.

To do it and preserve a prized European hornbeam tree while also transitionitioning the project to the adjacent lower areas surrounding to the north, the developers say they need a departure from area zoning to allow the extra sixth story of height.

CHS reported here on the pushback from a group of neighbors to the proposal that triggered Wednesday meeting where additional feedback and public comment can be gathered before the city decides on the plan.

Many of the speakers opposed to the sixth floor questioned the necessity of granting the developers extra height to save the prized “tier 2” European hornbeam tree. Some suggested the tree could be preserved with a viable development topping out at five stories. Others questioned the value of the European hornbeam in the first place.

 

One longtime neighbor from behind the former QFC spoke up for longtime residents and the idea that nearby single-family homeowners knew what they were getting into when they purchased their properties in the 1980s and 1990s.

“Well, the fact of the matter is, we did not buy into this,” the man said. “The city, through multiple rezonings over the years that we’ve lived here, has changed the zoning on 15th Ave E and left our houses alone.” The impact of this proposal on the neighborhood will be “colossal,” the neighbor said.

Those supporting the plan didn’t have a lot to say about the hornbeam but spoke optimistically about helping to address Seattle’s housing crisis and excitement about new units in the area, as well as new commercial space. One attendee said this type of mixed-use development is perfect for Capitol Hill due to walkability and solid transit.

An important voice in the discussion didn’t participate Wednesday night but submitted written comment on the project. Jeff Pelletier​​​​, who lives in the neighborhood, developed a mixed-use building on the street where his architecture and design firm Board & Vellum is headquartered, and has helped lead past efforts to create community design standards for the 15th Ave neighborhood, says he supports the project as planned at six stories.

“The city’s new tree protection code, as determined by legal review, allows for an additional story if a tree is protected in a way that this project is doing,” Pelletier writes. “The code’s impact determined the development capacity of this site and allowed for additional units over what would have occurred in a five story building.”

“Similar to any public comment having no bearing on how much parking is provided on a project, the tree code has created a situation where public concern over a sixth story is being misdirected at the property owner exercising their legal right to develop a property consistent with city code when it should be directed at the city who wrote the code,” the architect continues. “The city needs to be consistent in the enforcement of their rules.”

The results of Wednesday night’s session are now in the hands of a SDCI land use planner who will work with the developers as they prepare for the next step of the public process as the project moves to the recommendation stage of design review. What feedback gets incorporated in the next proposal will remain to be seen. Neighbors will also have a chance to speak up when that meeting is scheduled later this year. We are still a long time before the empty QFC and the building home to a collection of businesses including a Rudy’s Barbershop, local favorite ShopRite, and a handful of apartments are demolished to make way.

There is also a more disruptive path.

City decisions on the land use proposal for the QFC block project can be appealed to the Seattle Hearing Examiner. Those battles can be costly and time consuming affairs. In one recent example of a project delayed by years, CHS reported here on the Hearing Examiner’s denial of a Save Madison Valley appeal against permitting the neighborhood’s mixed-use PCC project, a move that finally ended the neighborhood group’s argument that the development’s environmental review didn’t adequately address climate change. It’s possible the examiner might eventually have to rule on European hornbeam trees and sixth floors above 15th Ave E.

 

HELP KEEP CHS PAYWALL-FREE
Subscribe to CHS to help us hire writers and photographers to cover the neighborhood. CHS is a pay what you can community news site with no required sign-in or paywall. To stay that way, we need you.

Become a subscriber to help us cover the neighborhood for as little as $5 a month

 
Subscribe and support CHS Contributors -- $1/$5/$10 per month

27 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
AAnnie Pearson
AAnnie Pearson
11 months ago

Moved here in 1976. Loved the small town feel. Still, serious development on 15th should have begun 20 years ago. And progressed rapidly after 2015.

Steve
Steve
11 months ago

Take a tree-watching walk around any block east or north of there. I think in comparison, there is nothing very “prized” at all about that hornbeam.

Steve
Steve
11 months ago
Reply to  Steve

Not only that, but the new development will likely plant more trees around that spot than have been there in decades.

Trees
Trees
11 months ago
Reply to  Steve

That is not true, to get an accurate count of trees you would need to look into the courtyard in the back of the building.

I will also say that I don’t think there is anything special about the trees along the edge of the property, the ones in the courtyard are more massive.

Someone should just take a picture of them so that the story can accurately told.

dan
dan
11 months ago

We build for and add more people, so we need more housing, but have gridlocked highways, inadequate bus service, Cap Hill Streetcars to nowhere, SLUT to nowhere, construction impacting every other block, much higher street crime and even more homeless. Something is working backwards.

Michael Strangeways
11 months ago
Reply to  dan

It’s just mindless “high density” blather from the rabble who think just buidling more and more units will magically solve all urban woes. Building thousands of $2k a month studio units doesn’t solve homelessness…in fact, it helps make it worse. It doesn’t help aging seniors on low incomes. It doesn’t do anything for people who want to have families; most units are studios or small one bedrooms. It does help property developers/owners make more money…that’s why it’s the preferred “solution” to fixing urban woes. When it’s exactly the opposite.

Boris
Boris
11 months ago

Pretty sure the housing they build will be lived in by someone…

zach
zach
11 months ago
Reply to  dan

I would only say that “bigger is not always better.”

E15 resitdent
E15 resitdent
11 months ago

Let’s go go go on this project, anyone who slows it down is not getting what the world is.

Lived here for 15 years, it’s way past due; let’s goooo

Chresident
Chresident
11 months ago
Reply to  E15 resitdent

The developers are the ones slowing it down here.

DD15
DD15
11 months ago

The reason anyone considers this development on 15th to be “colossal” is because single family homeowners have fought tooth and nail to restrict all apartment development to commercial and arterial corridors.

The reason businesses thrive on 15th is because of the large number of (mostly aging) apartment buildings in the surrounding blocks to the south and west, in addition to low overhead, single-story, commercial spaces. The apartments supply thousands of potential customers within walking distance, while the single-story commercial spaces are easily reconfigurable when businesses change.

The real tragedy is that we will destroy the commercial spaces that create the vitality of the neighborhood to appease the people in single family houses that selfishly never want the city to change, and who aren’t even appeased when they get everything they demand.

Seatown
Seatown
11 months ago
Reply to  DD15

It’s colossal cuz it’s six-story tall. Not everything fits the narrative of I have less than you there for you need to give me something. Like your backyard. Sorry there’s a purpose for single family housing; like growing families.

Boris
Boris
11 months ago
Reply to  Seatown

There are six story buildings a block from here (hospital). It’s not colossal.

Chresident
Chresident
11 months ago
Reply to  Boris

The hospital has tons of open space. This building will cover practically the entire lot. I’d be more then happy to give them a 6th floor for leaving a huge chunk of the lot undeveloped.

Boris
Boris
11 months ago
Reply to  Chresident

The hospital buildings take up exactly the same footprint as this building. The open space is behind the hospital buildings on the other half of the block – for this new housing that half of the block is currently single family homes. Are you saying that we should force those SFHs to be torn down?

DD15
DD15
11 months ago
Reply to  Seatown

And there are side effects to single family zoning, like runaway housing costs, social exclusion, a history of racial exclusion, exclusion of people with disabilities, energy inefficiency, increased transportation costs, insufficient density to support local businesses, etc.

This is a city. Families can thrive in apartments. Change happens, and when you restrict change (like through single family zoning), rather than gradual change over time, you get “colossal” and disruptive change. But the people sitting in $2 million homes that they bought 30 years ago for $50,000 don’t care about that.

Michael Strangeways
11 months ago

We need more LOW income housing not more over priced rabbit hutches for 20something tech workers.

Oh, and this development, like all new mixed use construction, will result in a row of empty commercial spaces that are too expensive to rent. OR, it’ll be another dentist office or workout place.

Debbie
Debbie
11 months ago

To not have empty retail space I think and I believe at least some would agree with me that the developers should try their hardest to get a new Metropolitan Market , PCC , or some other grocery store for the Whole retail bottom of the new building .

Jerry
Jerry
11 months ago
Reply to  Debbie

This! :)

Will
Will
11 months ago

Agree that we need more low income housing!

However, that takes $ from somewhere (usually federal, state or city government). We should institute progressive taxes to help fund more low income housing, but allowing more market-rate housing to be built means that those who can pay market rents (and trust me, there are a lot more people living in apartments that aren’t 20-something tech workers) have a place to live in a great neighborhood near great amenities.

Boris
Boris
11 months ago

Yeah young people are the worst. Why can’t the city just prevent new young people from moving here and leave it to the oldies already here?!?!

Justin
Justin
11 months ago

If you block the extra housing, and those additional people are pushed into the suburbs, how many trees are destroyed there?

Crow
Crow
11 months ago
Reply to  Justin

So true. The amount of trees and green space destroyed by city in-fill and redevelopment is insignificant compared to suburban development on raw land.

Tammy Jo
Tammy Jo
11 months ago

Re Height
6 stories on an arterial seems okay.
EIGHT stories are now approved in some residential blocks near light rail stations, blocking light to many homes & smaller apt buildings.

Check out upper Roosevelt for the canyon hell that plan has created.

Re Density
Climate – heat, fires, changed weather streams IS / WILL BE driving people north in years to come. We need to build the housing stock now.

Boris
Boris
11 months ago
Reply to  Tammy Jo

Paris and its lack of light is just awful with the 8 story buildings.

Crow
Crow
11 months ago
Reply to  Boris

The first consideration in buying a Paris apartment is the amount sunlight. Some apartments in narrow streets never receive direct sunlight. No thanks.

Boris
Boris
11 months ago
Reply to  Crow

And the others are empty with no one wanting to live in them, I assume?