The Capitol Hill developers behind the project to transform the old QFC block of 15th Ave E into new apartments, businesses, and plaza space want the new building to give the neighborhood a vibrant streetscape with a mix of trees old and new, small retail spaces to add to the street’s eclectic mix, and 170 new homes.
The only catch? They’ll need an extra story to pull it off. Wednesday, Hunters Capital will present its first public proposal for the property to the East Design Review Board and start the discussion about the tradeoff it is requesting to allow the project to reach six stories high in exchange for keeping two mature and well-loved European hornbeam trees on the north end of the property along E Republican.
“The scale of the property provides an opportunity to develop a variety of retail and restaurant spaces that will fit into the scale of the existing commercial context,” Hunters Capital’s design proposal reads. “Enhancing pedestrian life and access through the neighborhood is another priority that will contribute to the viability of the commercial spaces and help make this project a destination that draws neighborhood residents and visitors alike.”
416 15th Ave E
Design Review Early Design Guidance for a 6-story, 170-unit apartment building with retail. Parking for 99 vehicles proposed.
View Design Proposal (28 MB)
EDG–Early Design Guidance
Project Number
Theresa Neylon
CHS reported here on the summer outreach effort from Hunters as it prepared for the public design process to redevelop the block home to a Rudy’s Barbershop, longtime neighborhood convenience store ShopRite, and the adjacent grocery and surface parking lot that hosted a grocery since 1944 until QFC exited the street in 2021 in a tiff with the Seattle City Council over COVID-19 hazard pay.
Now Hunters, the Runberg Architecture Group, and Jett Landscape Architecture + Design, are ready for the first public test of their plans for the property.
The European hornbeam tree swap will be a core component of discussion. Hunters says shaping the building to allow preservation of the one tree considered a prized “tier 2” specimen and one of its brethren will help transition the project to the adjacent lower zoned areas surrounding to the north but that they’ll need another floor of height to justify the zig-zag design. The requested departure from area zoning to allow the extra height would result in a 170 or so unit building — about 22 more than a five-story building that doesn’t leave room for the E Republican trees.
The developers say E Republican is also due for a street parking overhaul. SDOT has said it will either “remove all parking on the south side of E Republican St. and maintain the angled parking on the north side of the street (total count: 6 stalls),” or “change all angled parking to parallel parking on both sides of E Republican St. (total count: 4 stalls).”
By the way, 15th Ave E’s rainbow bus stop platform will be staying through any streetscape changes on the block, according to the plans.
In all, the preferred “S” design from Hunters would preserve the E Republican canopy, provide space for a larger 15th Ave E plaza to break up the retail facade and provide additional corner retail space, allow for a north podium deck, make room for a “pedestrian through block” breezeway on the south end of the project next to the old firehouse building, keep the back alley from becoming too tightly crowded, and allow for residential use of the alley, the developers say.
The “S” design would create 170 new apartment units in a six-story building, with about 10,000 square feet of retail space, and underground parking for 99 vehicles.
Those 99 spots will be popular. CHS reported here the changes the city is making this month to add paid street parking to 15th Ave E — one of the last major commercial areas in the city’s core to add the meters — to try to free up more space amid near insatiable demand.
As for those 10,000 square feet, if a major grocer is coming back to the block, they’ll have to find a new way to do it. Hunters says its retail plan is focused on creating business spaces more like the rest of the street than the old grocery space.
“The storefronts along the west side of 15th Ave E range in size considerably, with some being as narrow as 14’ and others being as wide as 50’,” the design proposal reads. “We anticipate a range of sizes in this project to mimic the existing variety of scale, color and materiality already present along the street.”

The planned storefronts will be relatively tiny, a community priority that has been frequently ignored in recent Capitol Hill development — View Larger
Hunters says the mix “of glazing styles, materials, colors, signing, lighting and canopies” will “create diversity and interest along the street.” But it probably won’t make room for a big supermarket.
Meanwhile, the project to redevelop the neighborhood’s Safeway a few blocks away is further along in the design process but has hit a bump after the neighboring New Age church filed an appeal of the approval of the development’s plan for a new 50,000-square-foot grocery store, new apartments, and a massive underground parking lot on the site at 15th and John.
UPDATE 10/12/2023 9:42 AM: The board has moved the project through to the recommendation phase after a Wednesday night decision following the review session. Questions around the requested departures — including the key element of the proposed sixth story — will be answered completely in the next review. That session has not yet been scheduled.
HELP KEEP CHS PAYWALL-FREE
Subscribe to CHS to help us hire writers and photographers to cover the neighborhood. CHS is a pay what you can community news site with no required sign-in or paywall. To stay that way, we need you.
Become a subscriber to help us cover the neighborhood for as little as $5 a month.
They don’t need an extra story to “pull it off”. They want an extra story to make more money.
We shouldn’t be rewarding greedy developers for not tearing down old mature trees. They aren’t just asking for the ability to build the same sized building if those trees were removed, but a significantly larger one.
Don’t we want… more housing…?????
Many of us do, but some people will make people homeless if it means reducing the money to developers.
The funny thing they don’t realize is the main people that want less housing is landlords.
Not true. Smart landlords know that more housing brings more restaurants, small businesses, and services that make better places for people to live and support strong rent growth in those areas. A deteriorating 15th Avenue East does not do area landlords any favors, and most are very supportive of this new development.
How dare people have a place to live!!! Will no one think of the tree?
we… *shouldn’t* reward developers for saving trees??? did a chainsaw write this
Looks great! Well done by the developers to conserve the tree canopy and add additional density.
How is holding trees hostage for an extra floor going to help increase the much needed grow in overall canopy?
Adding additional floors contribute to increasing the overall urban heat output.
Where is the green roof? How about a significant solar production system?
I don’t see any contributions to the already badly overextended sewer system running along 15th.
With 90% lot coverage? Where is the on-site storm storage system?
They are choosing to build in an area that lacks basic service upgrades found in more recently built neighborhoods.
So, their plan is to punt the problem of more poop into the Pugent?
I’m laughing at your comments because they are borderline hysterical. Here’s some rational perspective to consider:
The existing property is already creating a heat island with the outdated flat roof buildings and asphalt parking lot, and maximum (likely 90%) lot coverage. All the while being an underutilized lot in a commercial district.
This stage of design review is too early to propose systems such as a green roof. Its a decent idea that could be submitted to the developer or architect for consideration in their next review stage, but that’s not what this stage of design review is about.
Also, on-site stormwater management is another thing that is just not part of the discussion for this stage of design review. It is something that is absolutely required by city code and will be covered in the building permits. I assure you that the baseline stormwater management required by code will be infinitely better than what is already there. Saying ridiculous things like “sending poop to the Puget sound” is baseless and irresponsible. The reality is that new developments tend to bring updated infrastructure to existing neighborhoods, such as new sidewalks and better stormwater management.
I’m tired of the tree agreement. If anything, its signaling your NIMBY attitude and I’d rather not get into it. I understand that people are frustrated with the new architecture and development in Seattle, but using trees and other baseless complaints isn’t going to help us solve the housing issue and will just continue to slow down our already broken system. If you want to live in a city full of single family zoning and dense forests, I suggest moving to Issaquah.
https://www.postalley.org/2023/04/08/why-seattle-apartments-are-so-expensive-and-staying-that-way/
The tree argument (I assume you mean) is based on physics and biology: tree canopy makes for a healthier place to live. That’s true no matter what the motivation of someone making the argument is. Using the word NIMBY is simply announcing you aren’t interested in addressing what is a real problem.
And this developer came up with a creative way to preserve tree canopy.
This is wonderful, start tomorrow!
Tiered setbacks of the 15th Ave side, like those shown for the alley side, would allow for less of a canyon-like appearance, when the other side of the street gets redeveloped, as it eventually will.
Think Denman Street in Vancouver BC: lots of tall buildings but still airy and open at the street level
I totally agree. Hopefully the design review board pushes for upper levels setbacks along 15th to minimize the canyon effect.
How many of the 170 units would be low income?
However many are required by city code, or a fee in lieu. Obviously.
How many in the unused lots are low income apartments?
Yes! Build housing and commerce to re-activate 15th
15th does not lack activity.
This sounds really nice! I hope it happens.
Love to see the progress! I hope the economic cycle / interest rate environment doesn’t stop this project moving forward.
Looking forward to this! Hope we can get it through the administrative hurdles quickly. Love the addition of new commercial space to 15th.
Sounds good. We need as much housing as we can get. We don’t need to characterize high quality and local developers as “greedy.” That kind of language is California-style mumbo-jumbo, and their NIMBYism has earned them skyrocketing housing costs and rates of homelessness. We should be happy that developers like Hunters want to work with the community to provide housing, smaller storefronts, and preserve existing landscaping.
Yeah, thanks for this.
Is this design perfect? No. But this is a good design.
My hope is the final design will look better than that being put up across the street at the former Hilltop station.
That design is horrible, of course, because the architects are a Bellevue-based, tasteless bunch of hacks whose specialty is building suburban Eastside strip malls. In a perfect world, the city of Seattle would have a list of preferred architectural firms to work with, like Board & Vellum, SHED, and LMN, and a black list of banned firms like the “designers” of the Hilltop station building.
But we don’t live in a perfect world.
And E. 15th is in desperate need of new retail spaces and some sort of revitalization.
Let’s hope the creepy Aquarian cult doesn’t succeed in its lawsuit against the Safeway replacement project.
I’m so sick of NIMBYs holding up development in this city, and my nausea turns into red-hot anger when the NIMBY in question is a creepy, creepy cult that somehow still exists in this, anno domini 2023.
What percentage of projects are appealed?
Bellevue hasn’t built strip malls in years. They are behind the times compared to Seattle, but they are also building urban mixed use all over the place. Redmond, Kirkland, Bothell, Woodinville, and Issaquah too. I was actually pleasantly surprised, but the lack of older buildings does make it kind of soulless.
Hope we get a new grocery store in that spot ? Like either Metropolitan Market or a PCC would be nice .
looks good but i personally refuse to approve any plans until my beloved shop rite is guaranteed to be preserved and cossetted through the process like a delicate and sickly child
6 stories will create a caynon type feeling on 15th. They are holding Trees hostage to try and gain more profits?Lets save the trees and also follow the building codes of the neighborhood. Having 10 concrete boxes below a large apartment complex doesnt create a viabriant neighborhood. 15th is a residential neghborhood, heres an idea – come up with some creative innovative ideas that will really be beneficial to the community. Maybe have large areas in front of each bussiness for outside seating or plants.
This looks great. Love the plaza and the variety of storefront sizes to allow small businesses. Yes, build the extra floor and bring on more housing!
I love the little side-plaza as well but with only 10′ between buildings and at least 3′ needed for ADA compliant asile, there isn’t much room. It would be so much better if it was 12-15 feet.
Looks great! 15th needs new life and a fresh feel!!!
There needs to be a grocery store as part of this. And I’m not sure this soulless structure is what this homey stretch of 15th I call home needs
No it should be a soulless parking lot instead… eyeroll
I agree we need a grocery store. I attended the meeting Hunter had for residents which was very helpful. It is good to have local (Capitol Hill) people doing this. At that meeting he said they had approached grocery companies and they said the spaces are too small and deliveries are difficult. Since then I have heard that Ken’s is actually smaller and might work. I hope they are approached.
Please explain why “we” “need” a grocery store, when there is a Safeway just 1-2 blocks away.
Because not everyone in this area is 1-2 blocks away from that Safeway like you are. Because we don’t always know if that Safeway will always be there. Because migrations of grocery stores to the suburbs create food deserts. Because it’s nice to have choices in shopping for food items, like maybe I think Safeway brand pop tastes gross and I want to buy another store brand instead. Unsure why it would bother people if we had more nice things in the neighborhood, like walkable grocery stores that aren’t a Safeway-Kroger, instead of less of them.
Rainbow Grocery was a sweet natural foods spot in a small footprint on 15th, back in the day. Perhaps another small green grocer catering to foot traffic. They always had a yummy healthy soup too.
Love it! Yay for more housing and for small retail spaces that will be more affordable for small local businesses!
A win-win. Build it
The 6th story should be blocked. The original design had 170 units and spaces for small shops at 5 stories. We have building codes for a reason in order to manage infrastructure properly. The addition of the 6th story is to provide more high end/larger units to the mix and has nothing to do with trees. We need more housing but we need the right mixes. Bigger isn’t always better. They allowed 5 stories on 19th and it’s been striving since and is in scale with the neighboring community and infrastructure, has provided numerous new homes and has raised rents along with it.
I’ve definitely heard that the sixth story leads to child birth defects
Glad to read that not everyone thinks that “bigger is better.” That mentality is having a significant negative effect on our city/neighborhood.
As a business owner on 15th Ave East, I think this is a step in the right direction. After all, it was QFC’s greed that got us here. So now it’s up to developers’ greed to get us out? Side note – in order to remove Tier 2 trees of this magnitude – the city has the choice to permit the tree removal, or deny it. If the developers rip it out without a permit it’s $8k per tree fee (unless I’m mistaken). A small price for them – so this does feel a bit ransom-ish. Leave the trees where they are.