By Cormac Wolf — CHS Reporting Intern
Tom Fucoloro has been behind the handlebars in Seattle for over 13 years. In that time he’s grown Seattle Bike Blog from a small side project to a pillar of the city’s thriving biking community, even netting a book deal in the process.
He moved to Seattle around 2009 after selling his car to fund his trip and biking full time. Faced with the problems of the city’s bike infrastructure he started looking for anyone who was documenting the experience of Seattle bikers.
“I kind of started looking around for someone else who was writing about bikes. And there wasn’t really anyone who was fully committed to the beat,” he says. “There’s an excellent bike blog down in Portland. And I thought, hey, I could do that in Seattle”
You can find Fucoloro Monday, August 28, at Capitol Hill’s Elliott Bay Book Company to celebrate the book’s release. He’ll be signing books — and likely fielding questions about our future I5-less Seattle
Bikes have been in Seattle longer than cars have, Fucoloro says, but he places the inception of the modern biking community at the first Bicycle Sunday on Lake Washington Boulevard in 1968.
“The city was expecting like 300 people to show up,” says Fucoloro. “And then somewhere between five and ten thousand people showed up, there’s no accurate count. And it became a watershed moment for the bike movement where it’s sort of, they’re all these people riding bikes, but nobody realized how many of them there were.”
“They’re like, holy crap, we should probably get organized and ask for some stuff.”
Fast forward 55 years, and the community is exploding in size, Fucoloro says, in part thanks to e-bikes and bike share. He describes how they work in concert, e-bikes allowing people to take rides they never would have before, and bike shares letting people dip their toes in the water to find just how enjoyable biking can be.
In 2018, Bicycling magazine named Seattle the best biking city in the country, a decision The Stranger immediately mocked them for. The city’s bike infrastructure is an ever-present topic of community meetings and bikers a trenchant faction of the city’s urbanists, their words absent the unvarnished praise found in Bicycling magazine.
After writing about the city’s progress for over a decade, Fucoloro can cite many examples of victory and defeat for the city’s bikers. Asked what progress bike advocacy has won in recent years, he cited his daily commute through downtown.
“You don’t have to leave a bike lane. It’s amazing,” says Fucoloro. “It took an enormous amount of work, over a decade. But it’s here, it’s really cool, and I think that if people try it they’ll be shocked by how comfortable and nice it is. “
But he contrasts the infrastructure downtown with poorer neighborhoods of the city.
“Southeast Seattle especially has huge gaps in the bike network, where there’s just no good route options.” says Fucoloro. “Yeah, that’s the entirety of, like, Rainier Avenue. … It’s the only good bike route through the neighborhood and it’s absolutely horrific to bike on. It’s very scary, very dangerous. People get hurt all the time.”
“And people have been asking, demanding safe bike lanes on Rainier for as long as I’ve been writing this blog and the city’s just resistant to it, they just won’t have it.”
As the biking community grows in the city, Fucoloro says community advocates have made progress in finding common cause with racial justice and other advocates, especially in terms of education.
“It’s pretty common for people to understand the fact that Rainier Valley streets are at this much higher collision and injury rate than streets in whiter neighborhoods,” says Fucoloro. “But that was not an accident. I think that’s pretty widely understood at this point, which, you know, has not always been the case.”
“Bike advocacy is not a monolith. There’s certainly examples of Seattle bike advocates like not getting it. But, you know, I think for a pretty long time now, there’s been a pretty strong focus, at least amongst a lot of bike advocates in town, to see things intersectionally and to not just show up when you need something from a community, but to be part of the community”
Asked what Capitol Hill could learn from the city’s biking history, Fucoloro demurred.
“Capitol Hill is kind of interesting, because there’s plenty of people who live in Capitol Hill, but also like, it’s a walking neighborhood,” he says. “They don’t even need the bike. You can just walk.”
In spite of Capitol Hill’s pedestrian proclivities, Fucoloro can still cite several bike-related projects in the works, of which the bike lanes between downtown and Broadway he is most excited for.
Asked what ideal futures he can envision for Seattle bikers, his answer is immediate and without reservations: get rid of I-5.
“I’m not joking. And we don’t need it. It was a mistake,” he says. “Did you know, I-5 is only built in that location because it was supposed to be a toll road? And so they designed it purposefully to cut off all the streets that go through so that locals would have to take I-5 and pay the toll.”
“I mean, imagine like, a busy boulevard, right? Where cars move but they don’t move super fast. And then I5 doesn’t move super fast either. I mean, are we really changing that much by making it a boulevard and building housing around it?”
I-5, Fucoloro goes on to say, leveled huge portions of the International District, the story of which is told in an exhibit currently on display at the Wing Luke museum, called Nobody Lives Here.
“I would encourage everyone on Capitol Hill to look at a map and look at how many streets used to cross I5,” he says. “Capitol Hill has always been a place that is willing to try some fairly radical things.”
In 2019, Fucoloro was approached by University of Washington Press to write a book about the story of cycling in Seattle, and how it parallels the history of the entire city. After several years of blogging and riding, during which the pandemic upended his plans and dramatically changed Seattle transportation, his book is releasing this week.
Images of Capitol Hill bikes from the CHS archives
HELP KEEP CHS PAYWALL-FREE THIS SPRING
🌈🐣🌼🌷🌱🌳🌾🍀🍃🦔🐇🐝🐑🌞🌻
Subscribe to CHS to help us hire writers and photographers to cover the neighborhood. CHS is a pay what you can community news site with no required sign-in or paywall. To stay that way, we need you.
Become a subscriber to help us cover the neighborhood for $5 a month -- or choose your level of support 👍
What is the point of the random photo of a bunch of cops on bikes? That photo is most likely from when they were out harassing protestors. There’s no caption nor commentary, and I don’t think Tom would approve of its use highlight biking infrastructure in Seattle.
It’s part of the history here… The Seattle Bike patrol is often cited as the modern rebirth of the city bike patrol, as though not really the first period, Seattle was the first in the modern car era to use bicycles for regular patrol rather than special duty.
That “history” is false, though often repeated locally. See, for example, Crosscut:
There may be even earlier examples, but in 1970 in response to deteriorating relations between the residents of Isla Vista, California (the mostly student bedroom community next to the UC Santa Barbara campus), and local law enforcement around anti-war protests that included burning down the local branch of the Bank of America and the fatal shooting of a protestor by police, the Santa Barbara County Sheriff established the Isla Vista Foot Patrol. Its officers have been patrolling Isla Vista on bikes and on foot ever since.
https://www.sbsheriff.org/command-and-divisions/law-enforcement-operations/south-county-operations-division/isla-vista-foot-patrol/
Also, note the different motivations for putting officers on bikes in the two communities.
I am not sure why this bothers you but I will say that bike cops is among the most efficient methods of dealing with crime downtown if only the awful council would let them. I am pro SPD. Done with druggies and thieves hiding as homeless.
This bike lost its logo! And now sports a high end mid drive motor (up to 1300W) 14k commute miles car f’in’ free!!!
I like everything about this dude except the I5 boulevard piece. Not trying to steal his thunder, but I5 should be a tunnel (or covered) so we can get around without routing around exits. There are just a small number of places to get east/west, imagine a town where that space was just fun residential parks or whatever. F cars.
My I-5 bit was in response to the prompt: “If you had a magic wand and could change one thing…” or something similar. So yeah, poof, gone.
I biked to work from Cap Hill to SODO (Uphill in the Rain on the way home). After a couple near death experiences in just a couple years I had to stop. It’s to dangerous.
Let me guess…because of CARS?
As a 25-year bike commuter between Capitol Hill and downtown, as well as a regular reader of Tom’s blog, I’m super excited to read his book! Congrats to Tom!
The bike infra in Capitol Hill remains a joke. Who builds one underutilized neighborhood greenways several blocks apart from the other underutilized greenway — but can’t even bother connecting either of them to light rail?
Even as someone who wants to bike, there’s no infrastructure that goes anywhere I’d need to go (unless I wanted to have kids to have an excuse to bike someone to school!).
Which roads are you talking about?
There’s plenty of bike infrastructure… it’s called roads and you can use just about any of them…. (except for signed portions of interstate highway)
Would like more protection from cars and less cars on those roads in general
From someone who’s been biking in Seattle for 30+ years, you don’t need “infra” to bike in the city. Just get on your bike and go!
A car-brained society is who! Out with cars!
Ahh cyclists, the self-anointed Brahmin caste of Seattle transportation.
Oh come on you act like car drivers aren’t the same way rolling coal and destroying the planet so their three ton monstrosity can take one person a couple miles.
Hey- all I ask is that you let me get where I’m going without threatening my life… Drivers act like a few seconds of their time to just wait and go around someone when it’s actually, like, safe is some kind of humongous hardship. Don’t get me started about not understanding things like yes, I have an actual right to make a left hand turn..