Post navigation

Prev: (06/09/23) | Next: (06/11/23)

This Capitol Hill ice cream shop is ‘woke’ — so why is it suing the city over CHOP?

A memorial to Anderson The memorial to Lorenzo Anderson who was gunned down in front of Molly Moon’s during CHOP

One of Seattle’s most progressive small businesses has sued the city over its actions around the CHOP occupied protest that grew from the 2020 Black Lives Matter and George Floyd murder unrest into a dangerous camp that shut down blocks of Capitol Hill’s Pike/Pine core and left two teens shot to death including 19-year-old Lorenzo Anderson who was gunned down in the street in front of the ice cream shop behind the suit.

The Molly Moon’s Homemade Ice Cream LLC v. City of Seattle case was filed this week in federal court.

It is being brought forward by the law firm of Morgan, Lewis and Bockius, the same firm that won a $3.6 million settlement with the city earlier this year on behalf of a slate of Capitol Hill property owners and businesses that sued over “deliberate indifference” from former Mayor Jenny Durkan, the Seattle Police Department and then-Chief Carmen Best, Seattle Fire, and the rest of City Hall over the handling of the camp that took over the streets around Cal Anderson Park in June 2020.

It is not clear why Molly Moon’s was not part of the previous lawsuit. CHS has asked the law firm and owner Molly Moon Neitzel for more details on the new filing.

Filed on the three-year anniversary of the protest camp’s formation, the lawsuit seemingly puts Molly Moon’s in position of demanding the city should have shut down the CHOP protests.

But the complaint filed this week begins with a defense of the protests even as it blames the city for the disorder that followed.

“This lawsuit does not seek to undermine CHOP participants’ message or present a counter message,” the filing begins. “Rather, this lawsuit is about Plaintiff’s constitutional and other legal rights of which were overrun by the City of Seattle’s decision to abandon and close off an entire city neighborhood, leaving it unchecked by the police, unserved by fire and emergency health services, and inaccessible to the public at large, and then materially support and encourage a hostile occupation of that neighborhood.”

“The City’s decision subjected businesses, employees, and residents of that neighborhood to extensive property damage, public safety dangers, and an inability to use and access their properties,” the legal team writes.

We’ve asked Molly Moon’s for a statement on the filing and will update when we hear back.

UPDATE: “At Molly Moon’s we hold race equity at the top of our list of our priorities for how we want to make the world better. Black Lives Matter,” a statement from a Molly Moon’s spokesperson sent to CHS reads. “The lawsuit filed on Wednesday, June 7 is not meant to undermine that important message. It’s seeking indemnification for the significant revenue losses and team morale impacts we experienced during and for many months after CHOP caused by the City of Seattle’s decision to abandon the police precinct and stop responding to public safety needs in our beloved Capitol Hill community.”

Durkan visiting the E Pine Molly Moon’s headquarters in 2017

Moon Neitzel and the company have been known for progressive employment and social policies and have been recognized as a small business leader in King County and the countrywith the ear of the mayor’s office. The company was born in 2008 with its first shop in Wallingford before opening its flagship Capitol Hill headquarters a year later on E Pine. It also has a scoop shop on 19th Ave E and has grown to nine locations around Seattle and the nearby.

In June of 2020, Molly Moon’s found its E Pine headquarters on the edge of the front lines of CHOP as SPD, the National Guard, and Washington State Patrol troopers tussled back and forth with thousands of demonstrators on E Pine. The first of the CHOP murders happened right outside the shop. The family of young Lorenzo Anderson finally settled their lawsuit with the city last summer.

In its lawsuit, Molly Moon’s echoes the case of the just-settled suit from property owners and businesses including developer Hunters Capital and the Richmark Label facility at 12th and Pine with complaints of blocked sidewalks, vandalism, and dangers to customers and employees that hurt business, and forced closures. The new suit also cites “reputational damage.”

“The impact on Plaintiff’s business was immense,” the suit reads. “While Plaintiff’s business had been impacted by COVID, Plaintiff’s Capitol Hill location suffered a greater impact to its customer base due to the reputational damage caused by CHOP.”

It contends Molly Moon’s had to close down three times during CHOP — including on July 1st when the city’s police swept in and cleared the encampments and suffered ongoing business losses because of the city’s actions.

The Molly Moon’s lawsuit also accuses the city of “the elimination of basic public safety” around CHOP and providing material support to the protests:

The City provided Cal Anderson Park, a public park located at the center of CHOP, for use as the staging ground supporting CHOP’s occupation of the surrounding area. Supported by the City, countless CHOP participants resided in the park at all times of the day and night, having turned it into a tent city. At any given time, hundreds of CHOP participants camped out in the park. Violence, vandalism, excessive noise, public drug use, and other crimes were rampant within the park, which is directly across the street from Plaintiff’s storefront.

The filing includes complaints about the city’s continued inaction around some aspects of CHOP including the community garden planted in Cal Anderson “in violation of City laws” during the protests that has been allowed to remain by Seattle Parks despite having not received “the approval to remain a permanent fixture as required pursuant to Cal Anderson Park’s historic designations.

While the filing repeatedly expresses Molly Moon’s Ice Cream’s support for First Amendment rights and the “inspiration for CHOP,” it does not document some of the E Pine shop and employee’s efforts in support of the protesters including a June 12th closure “to allow our mooncrew to silently march in solidarity” with a strike organized by Black Lives Matter Seattle-King County.

The suit also does not mention the signs that went up at the store following the July clearance notifying police officers that “Molly Moon’s is a gun-free zone. Please do not come inside if you are wearing a firearm. No guns allowed inside.” The signs sparked a minor media controversy in CHOP’s wake.

Later, Molly Moon’s made a portion of its E Pine space available to the Vivid Matter Collective, artists responsible for the massive Black Lives Matter street mural that remains on E Pine near the shop.

“Again, this case is not about Plaintiff’s agreement or disagreement with the inspiration for CHOP, or the viewpoints expressed by the people occupying that area,” the lawsuit reads. “Instead, it is about the City’s active, knowing endorsement and support of a destructive occupation of a neighborhood to the detriment of the well-being of those who live and work in that neighborhood.”

Conservative media, meanwhile, are licking their chops over the suit from a “woke” Capitol Hill business against the city over the protests. “Delicious,” right wing commentator Ari Hoffman wrote in response to the “anti-cop ice cream shop” suing the city over CHOP.

But for Molly Moon’s, its lawyers say the lawsuit is about the bottom line.

“Because of the conditions created by CHOP, in June 2020 and subsequently, Plaintiff’s customers and its suppliers were deterred from coming to Molly Moon’s,” they write. “Molly Moon’s Capitol Hill location suffered significantly decreased revenue and profits as a direct result of the City’s actions and policies.”

According to the lawyers representing Molly Moon’s, the company has filed a tort claim with the city for an undisclosed amount. The lawsuit is seeking compensation for financial damages to be determined.

 

HELP KEEP CHS PAYWALL-FREE
Subscribe to CHS to help us hire writers and photographers to cover the neighborhood. CHS is a pay what you can community news site with no required sign-in or paywall. To stay that way, we need you.

Become a subscriber to help us cover the neighborhood for as little as $5 a month

 
Subscribe and support CHS Contributors -- $1/$5/$10 per month

35 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Kay
Kay
1 year ago

Molly Moons was giving out free ice cream to the cops in early June. They might have changed their tune in July but I remember their initial bootlicking behavior

John
John
1 year ago
Reply to  Kay

Free ice cream? You should see our overtime pay from your riots. Lol I had a new garage built.

Capitol Hill Resident
Capitol Hill Resident
1 year ago
Reply to  John

Overtime pay from the cops rioting

FTFY

Please quit your job

Robert Kletzker
Robert Kletzker
1 year ago
Reply to  Kay

She was promoting her business at that time. It was not out of the kindness of her heart. There’s a big difference!

marky mark
marky mark
1 year ago

Because they’re hypocrites just like at least half of Seattle’s performative “progressives”.

chres
chres
1 year ago

I can understand wanting to go after the city and police for abandoning the general area, but doing so 3 years after the fact smells of throwing out morals just for money.

cap_hill_rez
cap_hill_rez
1 year ago
Reply to  chres

Agreed, this sounds like a cash grab once they saw the settlement from the previous lawsuit.

The filing should read:

Again, this case is not about Plaintiff’s agreement or disagreement with the inspiration for CHOP, or the viewpoints expressed by the people occupying that area,” the lawsuit reads. “Instead, it is about…getting a sweet slice of those taxpayer dollars.”

Neighbor
Neighbor
1 year ago
Reply to  chres

Had the police remained in the area Molly Moon would have been the loudest critic of that action. This is all about deep pockets and cashing in.

Kevin
Kevin
1 year ago
Real Talk
Real Talk
1 year ago

Crocodile tears. You want to actively support battle with cops on your own doorstep and collect damages because they didn’t simultaneously provide you “basic public safety”? GTFO. You don’t have to be a conservative to see how hypocritical this is. Let’s not forget who really pays Molly Moon Neitzel and her lawyer if the case wins.

MeMa
MeMa
1 year ago
Reply to  Real Talk

I’d like two scoops of chutzpah please, extra irony on the side.

Stephan
Stephan
1 year ago

Leaving any comments on Molly Moon’s position aside for a moment, I find the framing of this passing strange. It’s not hypocritical or mutually exclusive to (i) support the goals of Black equality and protection from racist policing and (ii) not want the city to abandon parts of the city. While it probably blows the brains of the Seattle’s lily-white progressive crowd, Black citizens throughout the country have long advocated for more (and better) policing of their communities.

Rob
Rob
1 year ago
Reply to  Stephan

The city, especially the mayor and police chief handled the East precinct situation incredibly poorly. In fact, I’d love to see what’s going on with their criminal investigation into the deleting of their text messages. 3yrs later to cover up their incompetence. Molly Moon has been a business that to my mind provides a fair service – hence the lines. They suffered at the hands of poor policy and poor policing and should be compensated for their loss. As should any of the advocates for change who were wrongfully detained, pepper sprayed or beat by baton or bike.

Daffodils
Daffodils
1 year ago
Reply to  Stephan

The contradiction is they told the police to stay away because they were afraid of them, but now are upset they didn’t get police protection after the police stayed away?

Which brings up your point, what was defunding the police about then?

Glenn
Glenn
1 year ago

Pathetic. They simultaneously argue in support of the protestors while lambasting the city (and indirectly the same protestors) for allowing the protestors to remain in the park, thus causing damage to their business and the surrounding neighborhood. Just call this what it is. Molly Moon let other businesses stick their necks out and do the hard work of legally pursuing the city successfully on these issues, and now wants to cash in on their success with a copycat lawsuit filed just before the statute of limitations for such an action runs out. Hypocrisy and greed come in so many flavors.

doug
doug
1 year ago

Mollys answer is so full of shit… they saw the 3.4 million dollar settlement and want a piece of the tax payers pie. They didnt list how much they are suing over cuz it prolly 10 times that which is lost. Owners are liars and greedy by nature… thank goodness for sweet alchemy

NoLongeeAMollyMoonCustomer
NoLongeeAMollyMoonCustomer
1 year ago

Why is it the city’s responsibility to guarantee Molly Moon’s income

zach
zach
1 year ago

Molly Moon’s = hypocrisy. Sure, hate on the City and the SPD but cash in anyway.

Sandra
Sandra
1 year ago

I really hope people
People think twice about spending their money there. What a joke. Can’t have it both ways, honey.

Picture_this
Picture_this
1 year ago

CHOP turned into a dirty Homeless encampment.
It was a poor display of what it initially intended to convery.

A.J.
A.J.
1 year ago

I’m wondering if the city’s punitive weeks long closure of Cal Anderson after CHOP is mentioned. That seems like it would have had some significant impacts on park adjacent businesses.

Reality
Reality
1 year ago
Reply to  A.J.

Don’t forget the months long occupation of the park by anarchists and drug addicts enabled by the city that resulted in 200,000 lbs of garbage that was eventually removed the following winter.

crow
crow
1 year ago

Molly Moon ice cream is over-rated, something heavy about it. Give me Kings Deli soft-serve anytime, at 25% the price of Molly Moon.

Picture_this
Picture_this
1 year ago
Reply to  crow

I agree Molly Moon’s overpriced. You are paying for all the employee perks.

chres
chres
1 year ago
Reply to  Picture_this

Oh no, not employees being paid fairly with benefits, horror.

Chaz
Chaz
1 year ago
Reply to  crow

Husky Deli

Derek
Derek
1 year ago
Reply to  Chaz

Husky Deli supports cops and is way over in West Seattle

Eli
Eli
1 year ago

Everyone who also lived near CHOP can now sue the city for “morale losses” and reduced income.

Picture_this
Picture_this
1 year ago
Reply to  Eli

Not a bad idea. Progressive city leaders were complete failures. CHOP nothing more than a dirty crime ridden homeless encampment. Stabbings/Rapes & Murders all part of the “Summer of Love”

Hillery
Hillery
1 year ago
Reply to  Eli

Can I sue for involuntary teargas inhalation when it entered my home

Reality
Reality
1 year ago
Reply to  Eli

I think CHOP residents should sue as well. The city’s negligence put us all at risk for a month. They broke the social contract.

Thomas
Thomas
1 year ago

Definitely not going to be a customer anymore. Can’t support hypocrisy especially when they claim its not the case

Violet
Violet
1 year ago

They literally got $2 MILLION in forgiven pandemic relief funds. Seems to me they’re opportunistic business owners, ethics be damned. I’m done supporting them.

Robert Kletzker
Robert Kletzker
1 year ago

Molly deserves nothing! YOU DON’T WANT THE POLICE AROUND, then you get what you ask for. There is nothing that requires the police to help you during an emergency! You are pathetic and the only thing you deserve is to go out of business!

Robert Kletzker
Robert Kletzker
1 year ago

I was a deputy US Marshal during the Two riots in 1999. And I we were overwhelmed. As a retired Law Enforcement officer, I fully support PEACEFUL PROTEST! But WTO was not peaceful and Molly’ ice cream shop openly discouraged the police from entering her establishment. She has been very vocal about her dislike for law enforcement. Now you want the help after you have treated us so like second class citizens? You deserve nothing! You should have protected your own property! No one feels bad for you.