Post navigation

Prev: (01/29/23) | Next: (01/30/23)

Calls for ‘Alternative 6’ to keep Seattle housing development from slowing as city holds ‘Virtual Citywide Meeting’ on comp plan update

(Image: City of Seattle)

A Monday night online meeting will cap off the city’s public engagement process around the draft plans for the so-called “One Seattle” plan, an update to Seattle’s 20-year plan to guide its development and growth and, many hope, do more to address the region’s ongoing housing crisis over affordability and homelessness.

It comes as many housing, development, and affordability advocates say the five plans being carried forward in the process will not go far enough to create the thousands of new homes, townhomes, condos, and apartments the city needs to meet predicted demand.

Those calling for an “Alternative 6” include City Councilmember Teresa Mosqueda and pro-growth advocacy and information group The Urbanist, arguing that the city should keep up its housing pace established since 2015 and not slow down the effort to build new housing:

Study adding 200,000 homes by 2044. Maintaining our same pace of housing growth since 2015 would entail 160,000 new homes by 2044. Why assume and plan for a deceleration of urban housing growth in the future if we want to drive down housing prices and regional climate pollution, and create climate-resilient 15-minute neighborhoods?

You can review the city’s report and analysis on the comprehensive plan alternatives along with amendments and more documentation at seattle.gov.

Monday’s meeting is billed as a citywide opportunity to provide “feedback to help guide how the City will invest in our communities to shape the city’s future” and follows a series of engagement sessions and meetings:

Virtual Citywide Meeting:
Monday, January 30th, 6:00-7:30pm
Meeting Link:
https://bit.ly/OneSeattlePlanOnlineMeeting

This meeting is hosted on Microsoft Teams, which is required for attendance. Once Teams is installed, you can click on the meeting link above or join via your internet browser. More information below.

Additional attendance options:

You can also add your voice via survey — click on TAKE THE SURVEY here — through February 3rd.

CHS reported last spring on the process as the Capitol Hill EcoDistrict worked to represent the area with expanded development capacity creating more “complete neighborhoods” in the city. We checked in again in October as the process had moved forward to alternatives hoped to guide Seattle away from its longtime “urban village” strategy in which development has been concentrated in the city’s most densely populated areas.

Now the call for “Alternative 6” would add an option to the city’s planning that would open up Seattle to levels of development matching the expanded growth achieved since 2015 thanks to emergency measures and expansions like the Mandatory Housing Affordability legislation. One strategy would be allowing multistory “four-plex” development in more areas of the city. It would also include planks to boost affordability with incentives for public and middle to low income housing, height bonuses for meeting high level environmental standards, and incentives for preserving tree canopy.

Meanwhile, officials project Seattle’s population will hit 1 million by 2044 — an additional 240,000 residents over the next 20 years.

 

$5 A MONTH TO HELP KEEP CHS PAYWALL-FREE THIS SPRING
🌈🐣🌼🌷🌱🌳🌾🍀🍃🦔🐇🐝🐑🌞🌻 

Subscribe to CHS to help us hire writers and photographers to cover the neighborhood. CHS is a pay what you can community news site with no required sign-in or paywall. To stay that way, we need you.

Become a subscriber to help us cover the neighborhood for $5 a month -- or choose your level of support 👍 

 
Subscribe and support CHS Contributors -- $1/$5/$10 per month

1 Comment
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
paul
paul
2 years ago

these “urbanist” types are always the loudest in the room, but don’t really represent the views of most Seattleites.

Their policies are a failure:

Driving up cost of housing at accelerated rate since their plans are implemented, loss of our historic and affordable housing stock, hideous new “architecture”. Lost views and sight-lines, loss of open space “backyard” habitat for birds and urban wildlife….MASSIVE CARBON EMISSIONS from demolition of historic buildings, excavating earth and hauling away, pouring concrete and new construction…. in many cases neoliberalism run amuck masquerading as “public-private partnerships” and up-zones.

It’s a lie that so much growth needs to go into Seattle. There are suburban areas alll over the region that could be comfortably “filled out” and made more walkable. It could make those areas more desirable synergistic rather than auto-centric sprawl-scapes. The model must be pre-ww2 neighborhoods/towns. No need to destroy the already dense and walkable historic Seattle neighborhoods.