The Seattle Redistricting Commission has kicked another local politics hornets nest with a last-minute proposal from a commissioner that would gerrymander the University of Washington campus — but not Greek Row and most of the school’s off-campus housing — into District 3 representing neighborhoods to the south including Montlake, the Central District, and Capitol Hill.

The proposed map from commissioner Rory O’Sullivan
The proposed redistricting would see the UW campus join District 3 while the surrounding U-District neighborhood, including Greek Row and other off-campus student housing accommodations, in District 4.
The split would likely diminish the collective voting power of students by scattering UW votes across the two districts. D3, meanwhile, would see its young voter stock even further boosted.
“The University of Washington and University District are a cohesive community,” student Sean Haney said in a press release sent by Redistricting Justice Seattle. “We’re a connected renter, majority-BIPOC, student-heavy community that faces many unique challenges, and splitting us hurts our voice.”
The proposed amendments come only days before the SRC holds its final vote on the map amendments.
CHS reported here on the final weeks of proposed changes to the council redistricting process including moves to carve off some of highrise-zoned First Hill from District 3 as areas of Eastlake were added to the district led by Kshama Sawant.
Carving off some of the UW voting block for D3 wouldn’t be a terrible thing for Sawant and future progressive and left leaning D3 candidates but, politically speaking, it wouldn’t necessarily be a win for the city’s socialists as a whole. Without the consolidated student vote, D4 is more likely to be led by a center-leaning representative. The current district makeup produced City Councilmember Alex Pedersen, one of the few members of the council who sometimes sides with Sawant’s “no” votes on legislation. But where Sawant speaks to her votes on grounds of socialist ideology, Pedersen typically casts the rare “no” votes over fiscal concerns.
When initially adopted for the 2015 election, each district was drawn to include roughly 88,000 people. Seattle growth has not been distributed proportionately. Each district is likely to end up with a bit more than 100,000 people. District 3, including Capitol Hill, the Central District, and First Hill, has grown proportionately larger and needed its borders to shrink.
The changes based on demographic shifts and population growth have important political implications in determining what kinds of candidates can make it through the primary, and who ultimately gets elected.
When the earlier proposed redesigned map split the Magnolia neighborhood between Districts 6 and 7, the Magnolia Chamber of Commerce pushed back and the SRC backed off the plan. The compromised preserved the integrity of the Magnolia neighborhood within its district, but the amended map now would come at the cost of a unified UW campus and U-District.
Community members have less than a week to organize feedback on the proposed changes.
“It’s surprising and disappointing that it’s such a fast moving, wide changing map at this point in the game,” U District Partnership executive director Don Blakeney said.
The Redistricting Justice for Seattle Coalition has started a petition to urge the Commission to keep the UW community together in one district, as well as a community letter for District 4 organizations to sign on to.
The Redistricting Commission votes on final map changes on Monday, October 31st at 12 PM. Members of the public can register to give public testimony here or submit written public comment here.
$5 A MONTH TO HELP KEEP CHS PAYWALL-FREE THIS SPRING
🌈🐣🌼🌷🌱🌳🌾🍀🍃🦔🐇🐝🐑🌞🌻
Subscribe to CHS to help us hire writers and photographers to cover the neighborhood. CHS is a pay what you can community news site with no required sign-in or paywall. To stay that way, we need you.
Become a subscriber to help us cover the neighborhood for $5 a month -- or choose your level of support 👍
I have to wonder with the musical chairs if the The Seattle Redistricting Commission has abandoned even the smokescreen of any objective criteria at all.
You can’t do districting without hitting these gerrymandering issues. Let’s agree the districts were a mistake and figure out a proportional representation approach.
Dear Seattle Redistricting for Justice Supporter,
On Tuesday October 25, 2022, the Seattle City Council Redistricting Commission voted to consider a map proposed by Commissioner Rory O’Sullivan that would split the University of Washington from the University District (the O’Sullivan Amendment), and a map proposed by Commissioner Greg Nickels to split UW from the U District, and split the U District itself into two districts.
This would dilute the political voice UW student and youth populations have in City Hall by dividing the UW community between two districts (3 and 4). UW is the largest school in Seattle, and this map stands to silence their voice in City Hall. Many UW students live in the U District. The U District businesses and community spaces interact heavily with the UW community—it is a cohesive, and underrepresented, youth community with shared interests and community members that belong in one district. Splitting the UW community is gerrymandering a renter-heavy, majority-BIPOC, student population at the expense of the law.
Sign this PETITION to tell the Commission: DON’T SPLIT THE UW COMMUNITY!
If you’re an organization, sign our organizational support letter here: bit.ly/rjs-uw
The public comment period will be open until the Commission files the final district plan on or before November 15, 2022, though we recommend submitting comments as soon as possible.
Just submitted my comment along these lines. This proposal, offered so late in the process and outside the four proposals earlier considered for D3, seems underhanded and ill advised.
College students make perfect socialists: living off other people’s money, never had a real job in their lives and believe in all kinds of fantastical things that don’t actually exists outside the classroom.
I don’t know how it works here, but when I was in college I did not vote in the district in which I lived… I voted by absentee ballot in the district that was considered to be my permanent residence…. where I was still listed as a dependent – my parent’s home.. Sure, this won’t apply to every college student, but it probably does to a large majority of dorm residers.
On campus student housing includes some graduate student housing where most would be registered to vote at the campus address. Students would be very disoriented if they are try to find their council member to address general issues of rent, pedestrian and bike safety, safety in general all related to the U District in general. The rest of D3 would not relate. It would dilute the advocacy of both D4 and D3.
You’ll note I didn’t say it would apply to every single person in that area… I’m not stupid. I’ll bet that it’s a pretty small percentage of those who live there though who are actually eligible to vote here at all… I’m just thinking it shouldn’t make much difference at all to either to D3 or D4, unless the rules are quite different from what I recall.
Perhaps college students just aren’t as capable these days… I don’t recall finding it to be at all cripplingly disorienting to be voting in a whole different state back when I was one.
That reference was not about voting, but trying to find the correct city representatives to comment on a local U District issue.
It’s not exactly super hard…. I should hope college students can figure out how to put a street address into a search box…
https://www.seattle.gov/council/meet-the-council/find-your-district-and-councilmembers
We’d all probably need to do the same if we wanted to figure out who to contact for an issue not in the immediate vicinity of our own home. I don’t know about you, but I don’t have the district map memorized…
Today the commission approved a final draft map for a vote at the NOVEMBR 8th meeting. It is the map that Redistricting for Justice thought the best of the ones that the commission had been considering and best represented community testimony. Below are the links. Community letters of support should probably be considered as they move to a final vote on Oct, 8. Joanna
https://www.seattle.gov/redistricting/how-to-participate
https://www.seattle.gov/documents/Departments/Redistricting/Amended_Draft_Plan_10312022_poster.pdf
https://davesredistricting.org/maps#viewmap::7ea13b8a-a1f7-4bea-96f4-7b2def9dc746
Hope the future constituents of Sawant don’t really want engagement, response, or much else from their somehow elected representative.