Post navigation

Prev: (10/04/22) | Next: (10/04/22)

Affordable housing and proximity to transit: Capitol Hill EcoDistrict wants to address Capitol Hill’s — and Seattle’s — north/south divide

 

HELP KEEP CHS PAYWALL-FREE
Subscribe to CHS to help us hire writers and photographers to cover the neighborhood. CHS is a pay what you can community news site with no required sign-in or paywall. To stay that way, we need you.

Become a subscriber to help us cover the neighborhood for as little as $5 a month

 

A recent REVIVAL market at Capitol Hill Station (Image: Capitol Hill EcoDistrict)

A new rain mural hidden at Broadway and Howell (Image: Capitol Hill EcoDistrict)

Capitol Hill no longer has a community council and its chamber of commerce is dead and gone. But the Capitol Hill EcoDistrict is moving forward to represent the neighborhood as Seattle makes new plans for growth.

Last week at a community forum held outside in the plaza part of the mixed-use housing and retail development above Capitol Hill Station, the organization announced a $300,000 grant from Wells Fargo to further power its work to champion development to bring some of the vital elements of life on Capitol Hill including robust access to public transit to more parts of the city while bringing more projects creating affordable housing to more parts of Seattle including densely populated areas like the Hill and the Central District.

“While we differ in our identities and we come from various walks of life, we want to suggest that feelings of safety and belonging can come from activation and accessibility, not necessarily surveillance,” Capitol Hill restaurant owner and EcoDistrict executive director Donna Moodie said at the Thursday evening forum. “With the climate crisis on our heels, what a better way to empower community than with affordable housing and proximity to transit. Our transit systems and especially housing affordability are critical to the success of public life in Capitol Hill.”

More market scenes (Image: Capitol Hill EcoDistrict)

The EcoDistrict’s research based on studies in the neighborhood and online that took place before, during, and now in this latest phase of the pandemic is being used to shape its advocacy for a new philosophy and new strategies as Seattle shapes a new comprehensive plan that will reshape the city’s land use policies for decades. CHS reported here on efforts from the EcoDistrict and parent organization and affordable housing developer Community Roots Housing to shape the process and guide the city away from its longtime “urban village” strategy in which development was concentrated in the city’s most densely populated areas.

In 2021, the EcoDistrict was selected by the Seattle Office of Planning and Community Development as one of five organizations to support “community engagement” for the Seattle 2035 Comprehensive Plan.

“This is what we call public life, our relationship to public spaces and the connection to each other within them,” Moodie said Thursday about the EcoDistrict’s research and studies. “But we didn’t just stop at the physical spaces. The pandemic has shown all of us how important our resilience can be. So we also looked at what you can’t see, you too, and what we rely on to meet the needs like food, health, housing, and safety.”

Erin Fried, deputy director of the EcoDistrict, says the group’s work is forming answers for Seattle’s next stages of development based on learnings about Capitol Hill as the city begins “reorienting potentially away from the urban village model.”

A major flaw of the existing urban village strategy that emphasizes clustering development in only the already most densely populated areas of the city is it “ignores the connections” between the areas, Fried said. The results can be surprising as in one EcoDistrict finding that examines how a “north/south” divide has developed on Capitol Hill and the Central District where you find income inequality, tree canopy inequality, and “heat islands” as you move south.

“What is really interesting about Capitol Hill is this north/south divide,” Fried said. “It’s indicative of the larger story of Seattle.”

Breaking up those islands — or, better, connecting them — isn’t necessarily only about building heights and multifamily housing. Fried said EcoDistrict strategies that show promise include shaping “biodiversity corridors” or “pollinator pathways.”

The EcoDistrict has also gained ground building community connection. An ongoing REVIVAL Market Street series has helped fill the Capitol Hill Station plaza with activity in a unique program that pays vendors to be part of the event. And, though the unusually dry start to fall hasn’t provide the best canvas, the EcoDistrict has also backed creation of some of the largest rain activate murals ever attempted in new works around the station using the Rainworks technique to mark hidden layers of art on pavement and sidewalks. You can find artist Amol Saraf’s creation hidden at E Olive St and 11th and designer Lourdes Jackson’s “rain paint” at Broadway and Howell.

“Our rainfall is what keeps us unique,” Jackson says about the work. “And as sometimes it may be a pain, it’s all worth it when you realize the beauty of the foliage and wildlife it keeps us close to.”

But there are also very straightforward factors that need to be addressed in the EcoDistrict’s work.

Fried says the EcoDistrict has found that the median household income in the north of Capitol Hill is “double what you see along Summit or Pike.”

“There is a major difference in between what people experience in Volunteer Park than in Cal Anderson,” Fried said of the divide.

Work to bridge those gaps — both here on the Hill and across Seattle — will continue with more Capitol Hill EcoDistrict events and forums and more research and more studies as the city’s comprehensive plan process moves forward.

Learn more at capitolhillecodistrict.org.

 

HELP KEEP CHS PAYWALL-FREE
Subscribe to CHS to help us hire writers and photographers to cover the neighborhood. CHS is a pay what you can community news site with no required sign-in or paywall. To stay that way, we need you.

Become a subscriber to help us cover the neighborhood for as little as $5 a month

 
Subscribe and support CHS Contributors -- $1/$5/$10 per month

23 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
d4l3d
d4l3d
2 years ago

The new Eastlake addition to the district may work at cross-purposes with the plan. The community may suffer a yet more acute version of dissociative identity disorder.

Eli
Eli
2 years ago

I was wondering if the EcoDistrict was responsible for this horrible event. I understand it was finally and deservedly kicked out of the plaza venue for their repeat bad behavior.

With their subwoofers on full blast every week, neighbors couldn’t work, study, or sleep. I registered 70+ dB in my home with all the windows tightly sealed, with my desk and floor vibrating and shaking for hours.

This was the kind of event you organize if you don’t want anyone over age 25 living in your city center. Good riddance!

(and to the organizers – please go “help” another neighborhood, or maybe be considerate to the people who actually have to live and sleep here.)

Matt
Matt
2 years ago
Reply to  Eli

I met a grey haired woman looking to perform at the last event, so maybe it’s not strictly an age thing 🤷🏻‍♂️ I’m sorry about that, I hate it when the leaf blowers and other things are going off, but it’s just sort of part of urban life

Eli
Eli
2 years ago
Reply to  Matt

Nope, not part of urban life at all.

Nice excuse, though – folks use it a lot more in Seattle these days.

Matt
Matt
2 years ago
Reply to  Eli

Amplified music in a public plaza above a major light rail station adjacent to a major urban park isn’t part of the urban experience? Where have you been in the last 20 years?

Eli
Eli
2 years ago
Reply to  Matt

Currently, I’m in Utrecht (Netherlands), about to leave for Amsterdam for a daytrip.

But, no, music blasting 20 feet away from people’s windows on *privately managed property* without consideration for anyone who actually needs to live there is not part of a responsible urban experience.

(Unless we mean urban in the American vernacular — of a place that’s crime-ridden, lawless and neglected — perhaps you do.)

Anyway, this discussion is moot, as the non-public company that manages this space apparently agrees more with the needs of the people who actually have to live right next to it.

Matt
Matt
2 years ago
Reply to  Eli

I was in Utrecht a few years before the pandemic started and had a very different experience from yours, so again, I think it’s just a matter of perspective and preference. If you choose to live in a building that includes a public plaza promoted for providing entertainment, I’m not quite clear what you didn’t understand you were signing for 🤷🏻‍♂️

Eli
Eli
2 years ago
Reply to  Matt

Also, it’s great you mention leaf blowers, since those are being banned in Seattle (at least the super loud gas ones).

https://www.q13fox.com/news/seattle-council-oks-plan-to-ban-gas-powered-leaf-blowers

CityofVagrants
CityofVagrants
2 years ago

So the goal is to drag down north Capitol Hill until it’s as unpleasant as south Capitol Hill?

Chop/Chaz would have never been tolerated up north. These are practically two difference neighborhoods with dramatically different wants and needs.

Matt
Matt
2 years ago
Reply to  CityofVagrants

The goal is to stop this mentality and think about how we can make Capitol Hill and Seattle a better place for everyone 🤦‍♂️

Caphiller
Caphiller
2 years ago

I don’t get the fuss about the “north-south divide” in Capitol Hill. Yep, some neighborhoods are wealthier than others…

Chaz
Chaz
2 years ago

“While we differ in our identities and we come from various walks of life, we want to suggest that feelings of safety and belonging can come from activation and accessibility, not necessarily surveillance”.

This framing is so off-putting. It is not just “a feeling of safety”. The decline in safety in the neighborhood is real and measurable.

I support activation as a tool in addressing the issues, but no amount of activation will address the root cause of the safety issues: thousands of junkies attracted here and enabled by stupid policies and drug dealers fighting over the lucrative market.

yetanotherhiller
yetanotherhiller
2 years ago
Reply to  Chaz

“Activation” is developer code-speak for upzoning. “Ignores the connections” means “let us make everything between urban villages midrise.” It’s all glurge concocted by marketing departments.

Matt
Matt
2 years ago

Minneapolis got rid of SFH and has been one of the leaders at providing affordable housing since… It’s locking in the redlining and other stagnant patterns that those who currently control land want to maintain. We should be a connected urban area, not a bunch of neighborhoods that were purposely designed to exclude some areas of the city 🤷🏻‍♂️

yetanotherhiller
yetanotherhiller
2 years ago
Reply to  Matt

If you want homogeneity, move to Irvine.

Matt
Matt
2 years ago

I never said I wanted homogeneity, I want city resources to be distributed in a fair and equitable manner that accounts for historical disparities, and I don’t want our cities zoning laws to continue to lock in our past mistakes…

yetanotherhiller
yetanotherhiller
2 years ago

Fried said EcoDistrict strategies that show promise include shaping “biodiversity corridors” or “pollinator pathways.”

In other words, greenwashing instead of a strong tree retention policy.

Chaz
Chaz
2 years ago

The eco district is the political arm of a developer after all.

yetanotherhiller
yetanotherhiller
2 years ago
Reply to  Chaz

And it shows. But then, one could say the same of the city government.

Matt
Matt
2 years ago
Reply to  Chaz

What has the EcoDistrict done politically? From their website they have mostly engaged in community enrichment projects throughout the neighborhood, so I’m not sure what you mean… Also, Community Roots is a public corporation chartered by the City of Seattle to provide affordable housing, something most other developers are not providing. You can critique how well they are doing, but I don’t see many others building/managing the amount of low-income units that they do.

Neighbor
Neighbor
2 years ago

Urban Villages seem to create mini suburbs within the city. Why not add density to areas with large parks so folks in apartments can easily access green space? As it is now the largest parks are surrounded by the largest yards. There are already bus lines connecting to Volunteer, Interlaken and Madison. Developers prefer the less expensive land but that should not overrule citizens’ right to breath clean air. The CD is deemed super walkable but those of us who live there have been inhaling construction dust for decades and it gets old

John M.
John M.
2 years ago

I would like to see more trees planted in the south part of the hill. I would like to see more trees planted and preserved all over the hill. Do not understand why we don’t have stronger preservation measures in place. As to the distinction between north and south, classist, probably, but I am not understanding “rascist.”

Matt
Matt
2 years ago
Reply to  John M.

If you dig into the data, most disparities in the US track race/ethnicity/immigration-status moreso than by income. It’s important to acknowledge that we have a long history of discrimination and bias that is still present today in historical land use patterns and through remaining cultural biases that we all hold