Post navigation

Prev: (08/31/22) | Next: (09/01/22)

Mayor’s parks spending plan includes adding new Park Rangers to Cal Anderson

Mayor Bruce Harrell was flanked by two happy parks rangers as he announced his new spending plan that includes a boost for safety programs in the public spaces (Image: City of Seattle)

Seattle Mayor Bruce Harrell is out with his $115 million per year spending plan for the city’s public spaces that his administration says is focused on making sure the existing parks and playfields “remain welcoming areas for recreation, learning, and healthy communities parks” as the city continues to grapple with an ongoing homelessness crisis while trying to emerge from the challenges of the pandemic.

“This Parks District budget proposal is focused on restoring, renovating, and maintaining our parks and community centers – making the significant investments needed to ensure these public spaces remain exceptional reflections of our city, now and for years to come,” Harrell said in a statement on the proposal.

CHS reported here on questions around safety, maintenance, recreation affordability, park development, and supporting community events and programs as Harrell’s office worked to plan for the next six-year cycle of spending, a budget process delayed by the pandemic and the parks department’s shift to “critical services” from only more traditional spending like lawn mowing and graffiti removal.

The new Park District budget proposal will cover the coming years for the city’s nearly 500 parks, playfields, and community centers.

The Harrell administration’s proposal includes $58 million in “necessary services” funded by the previous budget. The other half of the proposed spending, Harrell says, will include a small expansion of the parks system including turning Kay Bullitt property into a new Capitol Hill park and new initiatives to improve safety and cleanliness in Seattle’s public spaces including new park rangers and an increase in staff dedicated to addressing one of Harrell’s biggest urban pet peeves — graffiti.

  • Opening 12 new park sites totaling more than 10 acres.
  • Making major community center renovations at Lake City, Green Lake/Evans Pool and Loyal Heights.
  • Making all 129 public restrooms available for year-round use by the end of 2028.
  • Reestablishing a robust Park Ranger program, adding 26 Park Rangers (for a total of 28) to enhance safety and promote voluntary compliance of park rules.
  • Adding a new staff team of 5 employees to respond quickly to graffiti and vandalism.
  • Planting and establishing an additional 600 trees to increase urban tree canopy and mitigate heat islands and restoring funds to the Green Seattle Partnership.
  • Decarbonizing an additional 6 community centers and other SPR facilities, contributing to the One Seattle “resilience hub” strategy to combat growing impacts of climate change.
  • Doubling Community Engagement Ambassador hours from 3,000 to 6,000 hours in up to 15 languages.
  • Doubling size of the new Equity Grant Fund to support community-driven park improvement projects in under-resourced neighborhoods.
  • Funding 20,000 hours of youth employment opportunities per year serving 80 youth.

“We recognize that the influence parks have on our communities and lives extends far beyond sports fields and playgrounds – they are equity drivers and safe havens, outdoor study halls and strongholds in the fight against climate change,” Harrell said in the budget proposal’s announcement.

While much of the new spending would result in immediate changes like increased presence of “Engagement Ambassadors” and graffiti and vandalism clean-up crews, others are on a slower timeline. The $580,000 initiative to make all 129 public restrooms available for year-round use, for example, has a target of 2028 under Harrell’s spending plan.

Despite the ongoing crisis, the Harrell parks plan does not directly address homelessness or encampments. Seattle City Hall has been reluctant to add park resources or features that could help address the crisis or provide space for mutual aid groups including community discussions that began in the wake of CHOP that called for increased services and outreach, or resources like phone charging stations and rain shelters for mutual aid providers. Meanwhile, grassroots mutual aid efforts continue to utilize the public spaces even as sweeps have become commonplace.

Following incidents including this August murder of a man on the Cal Anderson basketball court, Harrell’s plan tries to address public safety concerns with a proposal to add 26 new park rangers. The rangers will be on hand “to enhance safety,” Harrell said, and “promote voluntary compliance of park rules.”

In 2013 when CHS reported on a previous iteration of the program, rangers assigned to Cal Anderson patrolled in pairs and were not armed, working in the park seven days a week from 7 AM to 10 PM. The Cal Anderson rangers were to “monitor and attempt to prevent potential property damage and safety hazards” and needed to be “willing to work outside in a variety of weather conditions, stand, walk, or bend for an extended period of time” and “regularly use a bike or pickup truck,” according to a job posting at the time.

The program was criticized for ineffectiveness and eventually pared down in subsequent budgets.

The new parks district budget proposal will now move to the Seattle City Council for debate and approval.

 

HELP KEEP CHS PAYWALL-FREE
Subscribe to CHS to help us hire writers and photographers to cover the neighborhood. CHS is a pay what you can community news site with no required sign-in or paywall. To stay that way, we need you.

Become a subscriber to help us cover the neighborhood for as little as $5 a month

 
Subscribe and support CHS Contributors -- $1/$5/$10 per month

23 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
d4l3d
d4l3d
2 years ago

No doubt culminating in a Harrell Park. This is traditionally what mayors do as a “look over here” political move.

Question
Question
2 years ago

This is encouraging. We also need the police to arrest the anarchists that continually vandalize the park, judges that will sentence them to community service to clean up the mess, and sweeps everywhere always to get the junkie riff-raff that have settled in due to Seattle lax policies out of here.

abe smith
abe smith
2 years ago
Reply to  Question

i agree 100%

Ace
Ace
2 years ago
Reply to  abe smith

yes! this. It’s depressing how so few have made the City so unsafe.

CHR
CHR
2 years ago

Oh man I’m so excited for all the entitled capitol hill folks who let their terrible untrained dogs run around to get showered with tickets. Enjoy!

d.c.
d.c.
2 years ago
Reply to  CHR

I love the dogs, let them run free. Not like there’s a good dog park anywhere nearby and everyone keeps them in the east flat field area. Cops have more important things to do.

lee
lee
2 years ago
Reply to  CHR

One can only hope!

SeattleGeek
SeattleGeek
2 years ago

I’m unsure how a patrol from 7am to 10pm would have prevented a spontaneous murder like what happened in August at 12:30am. It has seemed like most Cal Anderson crime happens after 10pm, so I think we’d need a night patrol more than a day patrol. Does anybody know if my observations hold water and whether Harrell’s new Park Ranger plans address late night hours?

Note: anybody who thinks that city parks are not used 24 hours has never lived in a city with a neighborhood park that one can just walk through.

d.c.
d.c.
2 years ago
Reply to  SeattleGeek

Yeah it feels like 90% of the shady stuff I’ve seen has been late at night. What are they going to do during the day, ump soccer games and chide people for having off leash dogs?

SeattleGeek
SeattleGeek
2 years ago
Reply to  d.c.

The day rangers used to come around and make sure you had your beer cans in paper bags and weren’t being too open about smoking pot on Teletubby Hill.

Crow
Crow
2 years ago

Hoping they limit the rangers to after dinner. I do enjoy the unofficial off-leash dog area in the afternoons.

CHRes
CHRes
2 years ago
Reply to  Crow

I’m sure you like taking a public space and making it your own. You are no different than the people that set up tents in the middle of the park and smoke meth.

Nandor
Nandor
2 years ago
Reply to  Crow

I hope they give you tickets until you stop…. if you want an off leash dog area lobby for a proper one. Don’t just take…

Ace
Ace
2 years ago
Reply to  Crow

so entitled.

Matt
Matt
2 years ago

6 years to open all of the bathrooms year round! Bathrooms should be a public right, any notion that you have to pay or own property to defecate is ludicrous!

Nandor
Nandor
2 years ago
Reply to  Matt

If a small subset of people weren’t allowed to trash them, shoot up in them and leave their needles/blood all over or hide in them to attack people maybe the rest of the public would be more willing to see them open all of the time….

Matt
Matt
2 years ago
Reply to  Nandor

We subsidize a bunch of other stuff like roads and sidewalks that are similarly trashed by a small subset of users but no one seems to bat an eye about that… Yes, let’s treat the mental health and drug addiction seriously, but I’m sure as hell that someone messing themselves or using a bush because they can’t find a bathroom isn’t helping 🤷🏻‍♂️ We closed a lot of public amenities in the 60s and 70s because we didn’t want to integrate with African Americans, and now we’re closing a lot of public amenities because we don’t want to integrate with people experiencing poverty, mental health, and/or drug addiction… It’s incredibly sad to see people continue to blame individuals for systemic problems…

Nandor
Nandor
2 years ago
Reply to  Matt

Please – not even remotely equivalent… People absurdly not wanting to share a bathroom with someone of a different skin color is absolutely NOT not the same as not wanting to use a public bathroom because you have legitimate concerns that you might be poked with a dirty needle or sexually assaulted?

Roads are not trashed by a subset of users – unless you think people who eat are a small subset… yes, trucks cause more road wear, but unless you somehow manage to create everything you use out of your studio apartment, you are part of that “subset”, drive or not. Not to mention that we make people pay fees to use those roads that are at least in small part determined by the wear and tear they cause..

As a society we do take responsibility for upkeep of public facilities – but we also, rightly, expect some responsibility out of the users too. We expect that upkeep to be from normal/expected wear and tear not because of intentional damage or uses that the facility was not intended for..

Responsible people eventually get tired of paying and paying and paying to just keep fixing these things that they end up not even being able to use, over and over and over again… Put the money into treatment programs, get people into them and then fix the bathrooms – treat the disease not the symptoms.

See the photo? This is why we cannot have nice things.. it would be fine to have to replace the tools if they eventually wore out.. but who’s going to keep putting them back when someone will just come and steal them all again?

Matt
Matt
2 years ago
Reply to  Nandor

Amazon bros intentionally wreck our stuff too, stop equating antisocial behavior with houseless and mentally ill. I think we need a “yes and” approach… stop closing public facilities and actually staff them so that we don’t have those issues. I also see people on the street that are digging through our waste and making use of it, that’s part of the reason we can’t have nice things, because we’re stuck in a thing-oriented society rather than a people-oriented society. What is going to happen if you send the people wrecking the bathroom to jail in our current system? When they come out do you think they will be more or less likely to be a benefit to society? Let’s treat them with compassion, help them, figure out why they got in that situation and how we all can work together to make it less likely to happen in the future.

Glenn
Glenn
2 years ago
Reply to  Matt

It is well known that Amazon bros roam Capitol Hill trashing public infrastructure. Thank you soooo much for pointing that out Matt. Where to begin?

Matt
Matt
2 years ago
Reply to  Glenn

I literally pick up trash and report vomit and damage from them and other late night weekend partiers on a regular basis. Most of the unhoused residents I talk to are quite friendly and care more about the community and neighborhood than most housed residents I’ve interacted with. Again, all I am saying is that easy access to a bathroom should be a public right… I’m pulling my hair out here that there are actually people in the world that want to fight that notion 😧

zach
zach
2 years ago

Mayor Harrell continues to make changes to the city’s approach to things like homeless camps, vandalism, and graffiti….all of which were basically ignored before he took office. I especially like his proposal for many more park rangers, and a dedicated team to clean up graffiti in our parks. Thank you, Bruce! (now if only our lefty City Council will endorse his proposals).

CH Resident
CH Resident
2 years ago

Related but unrelated, I was walking through Cal Anderson Park this morning and one of the park staff was attempting the clean one of the bathrooms (I think the women’s room), and she was retching horribly. I don’t know what she was trying to clean up in there but I can’t help feeling she isn’t paid enough to do it.