Post navigation

Prev: (05/06/24) | Next: (05/06/24)

‘The basics of a 21st-century transportation system’ — Seattle boosts transit levy proposal to $1.45B with $100M more for sidewalks, bikes, and transit

Harrell digs in (Image: SDOT)

Mayor Bruce Harrell’s office has finalized his proposal for the city’s next transportation levy planned to go before Seattle voters in November — now with an even bigger price tag: $1.45 billion.

The Seattle Times is calling the eight-year proposal Seattle’s “biggest-ever property tax proposal.”

Transit, biking, and pedestrian advocates are calling it an improved proposal after a month of criticism over the plan’s focus on repairs, replacements, and realignments over new street and transit projects.

The mayor said Friday at a press conference unveiling the new proposal that feedback shaped a $100 million addition to the plan.

“Over the last month, we’ve received feedback from thousands of Seattle residents who want a transportation system that is safe, connected, and well maintained – this proposal will help get us there,”  Harrell said in a statement.

Transit advocacy leaders have been measured in their enthusiasm for the proposal, praising the administration for listening to constituents but framing the plan’s spending on elements like safety, transit, and non-motor vehicle travel as barely adequate.

“We thank the transit riders and the community of advocates who spoke up to ensure this levy ushers in the transportation future we need,” Kirk Hovenkotter, executive director, of the Transportation Choices Coalition, said in a statement from the mayor’s office that called the proposal’s investments “the basics of a 21st-century transportation system.”

“We thank Mayor Harrell for his leadership on the levy and for being responsive to community feedback.”

The updated levy proposal will add a more than $20 million to boost sidewalk work including adding 250 blocks of new sidewalks in the first four years.

The administration also responded to advocates, boosting funding earmarks for improving transit corridors by 20% to around $145 million in spending in the plan to improve safety and connectivity with light rail stations and on key routes like the 3, 4, and 31.

Bicycle spending in the proposal was also boosted around 20% with about $114 million in planned safety spending, and expansion of the city’s bike networks.

Much of the proposed levy spending will go to much need infrastructure spending including $423 million in planned repaving, and $221 million for the city’s aging bridges, SDOT says:

  • $423 million to repave arterial streets that carry the most buses, trucks, and cars, and improve infrastructure for people walking, rolling, biking, and taking transit.
  • $221 million to keep bridges in reliable working condition and prepare for future bridge projects. ($3 million added to the new Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program to expand bridge preservation focused on optimum treatment cycles.)
  • $162 million to make targeted and community-requested Vision Zero safety improvements to streets, sidewalks, intersections, and crossings to reduce traffic collisions, severe injuries, and fatalities. (This includes a $41 million Neighborhood Initiated Safety Partnership Program and an additional $14 million District Project Fund to address emergent neighborhood concerns and requests.)
  • $145 million to connect people safely to transit hubs, including Link light rail stations and bus stops, and reduce delays on bus routes. ($23 million added to improve transit reliability and safety.)
  • $135 million to build and repair sidewalks, crossings, and curb ramps so people walking and rolling can safely get to where they need to go. ($26M added to improve walking and rolling, including a commitment to build 250 blocks of new sidewalks or alternative walkways in 4 years.)
  • $114 million  to expand Seattle’s protected bike lane network; connect schools to bike lanes, paths, and neighborhood greenways; and maintain and upgrade existing bike lanes. ($20 million added to expand the bike network, with a focus on South Seattle.)
  • $100 million to install new and maintain and upgrade traffic signals for safe, reliable movement; improve pedestrian and bike accessibility; and support traffic operations during large events and for trips in and out of the port.
  • $66 million to activate public spaces and improve lighting in partnership with business districts and community organizations so people can enjoy unique and vibrant, activated spaces. ($11 million added to improve public spaces including additional lighting leading to transit stops and stations and additional project development for Occidental Promenade.)
  • $59 million to make direct investments in addressing climate change, reducing air pollution and making sustainable transportation options more available, in addition to hundreds of millions of dollars in climate-forward, pollution-reducing investments across other areas of the levy. ($10 million added to support Seattle City Light’s expansion of publicly available electric vehicle chargers.)
  • $25 million  to make freight improvements to support trucks delivering goods and providing services.
  • New sidewalk and infrastructure strategies ($5 million)  to increase sidewalk repair and establish a Transportation Funding Task Force.

Seattle Department of Transportation director Greg Spotts said the revised proposal would give SDOT 17% more purchasing power “to maintain our modernize our streets than the current Levy to Move Seattle.”

The proposal will now make its way through the Seattle City Council before landing on the ballot for the city’s voters this fall. If passed, the funding and spending plan will replace the $930 million previous levy approved in 2015.

As the proposed levy moves forward, the city is also reshaping its guiding Seattle Transportation Plan that leaders say emphasizes equity and economic development.

Under the plan and with the power of the new levy, the 23rd Ave corridor is an example of the type of transportation investments the city will focus on in coming years with reconstruction and paving, a corridor safety analysis, additional transit investment, and crossing improvements, sidewalk repair, and neighborhood greenway upgrades.

The council’s transportation leadership is eager to carry the proposal forward.

“Building and maintaining bridges, roads, sidewalks, bike lanes, and buses may seem like the boring work of government, but few things shape the way we interact with our city and connect with each other more,” the council transportation chair and West Seattle representative Rob Saka said in a statement. “We have a tremendous responsibility to get this right and deliver the everyday basics in an extraordinary way.”

Paying for it all leans on the city’s property owners. The city says that under the current expiring levy, the cost to a typical homeowner is around $24 per month. The new eight-year levy proposal would increase the monthly cost by 70% to $41 per month.

 

PLEASE HELP KEEP CHS PAYWALL-FREE!
Subscribe to CHS to help us pay writers and photographers to cover the neighborhood. CHS is a pay what you can community news site with no required sign-in or paywall. Become a subscriber to help us cover the neighborhood for as little as $5 a month.

 

 

 

Subscribe and support CHS Contributors -- $1/$5/$10 per month

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

24 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
E15 resitdent
E15 resitdent
13 days ago

All I want is homeless people and open heavy drug users to no longer be on our streets.

I’ll pay unlimited amounts for that.

Not sure if this is spending money in the right way but I’ll vote yes.

chHill
chHill
13 days ago
Reply to  E15 resitdent

???

This is transportation spending…unless you’re suggesting moving homeless people under bridges after we improve them, this doesn’t address our need for more housing and rent control.

If you’re willing to pay unlimited amounts, you should advocate for higher taxes on corporations and wealthy individuals at federal, state, and local levels.

(Though I do love everything in this bill…we should further increase the levy and prioritize input from our most vulnerable populations)

E15 resitdent
E15 resitdent
12 days ago
Reply to  chHill

Sidewalks are taken over by homeless.

So are bus stops.

Bus stops are where people get shot at.

You can’t separate these things – even though you may want to.

Homeless and rampant drug use are the most harmful things in our public spaces, and until those are completely removed, nothing else matters.

Derek
Derek
12 days ago
Reply to  E15 resitdent

Please. Stop with the anti-homeless sentiment. It’s in every one of your posts, you hate the poor, we get it Karen

butch griggs
butch griggs
12 days ago
Reply to  E15 resitdent

You don’t use transit. So what’s with all the negative?

I DO USE transit exclusively. I live on Capitol Hill. It’s not what you make it out to be at all.

chHill
chHill
12 days ago
Reply to  E15 resitdent

Lol I think you’re missing the point–the transportation funding won’t house the homeless because it doesn’t address their plight. Yes, homeless people touch sidewalks, but funding sidewalks doesn’t help the homeless people directly get homes. Still with me?

We all clearly want the homeless to have homes, but that won’t happen without a similar levy focused on either rent control, or building more ‘designated-affordable’ housing. That’s where you can pay “unlimited amounts” and have it help the problem.

James
James
12 days ago
Reply to  E15 resitdent

You are making stuff up now. The mayor has swept every tent and you’re still whining and moaning??? This is assinine behavior.

Flying Fingers
Flying Fingers
13 days ago

I hope they are actively listening to individuals with disabilities; intentions and feedback will undoubtedly be invaluable.

butch griggs
butch griggs
12 days ago
Reply to  Flying Fingers

As a disabled Veteran I assure you hey take good care of us and are constantly asking for feedback, Ideas etc. If you join the survey they give you a gift card :O)

ConfusedGay
ConfusedGay
12 days ago

Could we get some info on the “sidewalk work” they plan to do? The city requires homeowners and commercial landowners to maintain their sidewalks; what is this money for?

Capt. Obvious
Capt. Obvious
12 days ago
Reply to  ConfusedGay

You really are confused and ignorant. Property owners are only responsible for mowing and cleaning snow. Not Rebuilding or repairing sidewalks.

ye haw
ye haw
12 days ago
Reply to  Capt. Obvious

why are you so rude? ^

The Obvious
The Obvious
12 days ago
Reply to  Capt. Obvious

Homeowners are responsible for the sidewalks that are along their homes, period. The city can and does require them to be repaired though normally this only happens when other construction is happening.

Make complaints via Find it/Fix it if you find problems.

Let's talk
Let's talk
11 days ago
Reply to  Capt. Obvious

Seattle Municipal Code: Seattle’s code requires that adjacent property owners keep their sidewalks in good repair and safe for public travel. This means keeping the sidewalk clear from vegetation overgrowth, snow, and ice accumulation, as well as making repairs to the sidewalks when damaged. They spent 3.5 weeks upgrading the sidewalk as it joins the street in our neighborhood and we are all still scratching our heads as to what the motivation was.

ConfusedGay
ConfusedGay
11 days ago
Reply to  Let's talk

@Capt. Obvious, let me know where I should mail you the notice the city left me demanding we redo the sidewalk along our house because of cracks from tree roots.

Hence my question about what the $20mm is for? More people walking around inspecting things while I drive on pothole-filled streets?

louise
louise
12 days ago

Thank goodness we are finally moving. We have contributed through our 40+ years of taxes thousands upon thousands of $$ to transportation costs. The Monrail went bankrupt, Sound Transit is billions in cost overruns and over a decade behind. The sidewalks suck, the potholes and cobblestone streets are absurd and dangerous for bikes and cars. The city has a deficit, the schools have a deficit. Things just aren’t right. Seattle wastes a lot of money.

butch griggs
butch griggs
12 days ago
Reply to  louise

The monorail is not only, not bankrupt. It’s as good as it’s ever been. At NO COST to us, the taxpayers. It’s all new stuff. “Potholes and cobblestone streets”??? Really?

The only reason we are behind on funding is because a certain voter base is constantly saying NO to everything…for 40+ years.

genevieve
genevieve
12 days ago
Reply to  butch griggs

I believe louise is referring to the monorail we were SUPPOSED to get instead of light rail, which was put to a vote again and again and again – but then after properties were taken, their financial controller embezzled and the who project collapsed.

Glenn
Glenn
11 days ago
Reply to  butch griggs

What exactly has this alleged voter base been saying no to for the last forty years? Levies of all kinds pass with ease. What are you refering to?

KinesthesiaAmnesia
KinesthesiaAmnesia
11 days ago
Reply to  butch griggs

Their motto was “Rise Above It All”: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seattle_Monorail_Project The Stranger & Dan Savage were big supporters, IIRC. I moved to Interbay around 2000 in the hopes that the monorail would happen but it didn’t and Interbay kinda sucked. But I guess it probably still would have kinda sucked even with a monorail.

zach
zach
12 days ago

This proposal is a huge increase over the existing levy, and I am not at all confident that SDOT will spend the money wisely and with the best priorities. It is by far the most dysfunctional City department.

chHill
chHill
12 days ago
Reply to  zach

Wrong! Most dysfunctional department award goes to SPD.

James
James
12 days ago
Reply to  chHill

Yeah SPD takes the cake on being dysfunctional and in dire need of a reimagining/divesting

Recline Of Western Civilization
Recline Of Western Civilization
12 days ago

I can barely afford groceries and once I’m evicted from my current rental of 12 years for tear down and development I’ll probably move to Tacoma because I only make less than the low half of 5 figures. No room for losers in Seattle anymore.