So wait these are actually in the street? Huh. I’d heard they’d be in parking lots, or on the sidewalk. Interesting…
Do the parkers get a little sticky parking payment ticket to pay for the space all day to keep the cops off their back? Or is this pre-permitted? Or is it just hope-for-the-best-that-the-cops-dont-shut-it-down strategy?
My questions regarding this to the unpavingparadise blog have gone unposted and unanswered. :/
The park is permitted — hope it doesn’t lose street cred
yancy
16 years ago
I hear they’ve got plants to give away once the park goes away.
nno
16 years ago
jseattle- geurilla installations would cetainly have a different feel to them overall, but no lost cred in my book- i’ve just been genuinely curious to know how its all been orchestrated. :)
jesse
16 years ago
Why do we have to copy everything San Francisco does, only… like… a year later?
http://www.rebargroup.org/projects/parking/
jesse
16 years ago
And because I feel bad just whining about stuff all of the time. I’ll offer something useful. How about a parking spot jacuzzi? Niiiiice.
Although it was an awesome tiny park in its own right, the Unpaving Paradise mini-park was also an outreach event for the park-to-be at John and Summit. Last the public heard, Parks needs $150K+ to build this park as designed (yep, that’s almost twice what we heard before).
Without the money, all we get is a grassy slope – better than a parking lot, but the neighborhood already has that at Thomas St. and Cal Anderson. With the money, we get a sorely needed P-Patch (plus more eyes on the park), seating, trash cans, a barbecue, skate dot, etc. Unfortunately, it’s fallen on the community to take John and Summit from a lawn to an urban gem. Fortunately, we’re very passionate about our green space.
To learn more or donate, see unpavingparadise.blogspot.com.
But what the hell: here’s the q13 video.
but a useful redundant comment! thanks
So wait these are actually in the street? Huh. I’d heard they’d be in parking lots, or on the sidewalk. Interesting…
Do the parkers get a little sticky parking payment ticket to pay for the space all day to keep the cops off their back? Or is this pre-permitted? Or is it just hope-for-the-best-that-the-cops-dont-shut-it-down strategy?
My questions regarding this to the unpavingparadise blog have gone unposted and unanswered. :/
The park is permitted — hope it doesn’t lose street cred
I hear they’ve got plants to give away once the park goes away.
jseattle- geurilla installations would cetainly have a different feel to them overall, but no lost cred in my book- i’ve just been genuinely curious to know how its all been orchestrated. :)
Why do we have to copy everything San Francisco does, only… like… a year later?
http://www.rebargroup.org/projects/parking/
And because I feel bad just whining about stuff all of the time. I’ll offer something useful. How about a parking spot jacuzzi? Niiiiice.
I read this comment on Slog last year jesse. But anyhow, today’s activities are part of National Parking Day and Seattle participated last year.
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/379929_noparking20.html
Although it was an awesome tiny park in its own right, the Unpaving Paradise mini-park was also an outreach event for the park-to-be at John and Summit. Last the public heard, Parks needs $150K+ to build this park as designed (yep, that’s almost twice what we heard before).
Without the money, all we get is a grassy slope – better than a parking lot, but the neighborhood already has that at Thomas St. and Cal Anderson. With the money, we get a sorely needed P-Patch (plus more eyes on the park), seating, trash cans, a barbecue, skate dot, etc. Unfortunately, it’s fallen on the community to take John and Summit from a lawn to an urban gem. Fortunately, we’re very passionate about our green space.
To learn more or donate, see unpavingparadise.blogspot.com.